Pay off mortgage?

I have a flexible reserve (Legal & General, now administered by Northern
Rock) mortgage with 6 years to run, outstanding balance 18k, currently
5.55%. Am I right in thinking that to pay it off I am effectively avoiding
tax on the interest I would otherwise earn on the 18k, i.e., I would need
to find a savings return of some (5.55 x 100/80)%, = 7%? Any views on the
best course of action (including a compromise) very welcome.
Reply to
Andy1973
Using savings to pay off debt is usually a good idea (unless it's 0% credit card debt!), but be sure you will not need those savings, as whilst paying off mortgage is normally simple, getting the money back should you need it for a rainly day, could cost you in arrangement fees.
Reply to
Adrian Boliston
Short answer: Yes.
It's a bit of a waste of the flexible reserve facility not to take advantage of it. So it might be better to stick the money into the available reserve instead of paying the whole loan off and redeeming the mortgage early, except that they'll probably require you to have a minimum principal balance outstanding of £500 or £1000. You need to ask them to reduce the Actual Payment to £1000x0.0555/12, otherwise they'll keep taking what they took before and as soon as the balance drops below their redemption threshold they'll just redeem. But if you know you won't need to borrow the money back over then next 6 years you may as well just redeem now and be done with it.
If the mortgage loan is interest-only, you would obviously be saving £18k x .0555 x 6 = £6k in loan interest over the next 6 years, whilst if you stuck the cash into a deposit account at 4.8%, you would earn £4566 in credit interest (that's ((1+0.8x0.048)^6-1)x£18k). Clearly you'd be £1434 better off paying off the loan, and that's not counting interest earned on the saved interest.
But if it's a repayment mortgage, probably costing £294.50 a month, you'd expect to save only £3204 in loan interest over the period (that's £294.50x72-£18k), and it might at first sight be better to go for the deposit. But that's a mistake, because it assumes the availability of an external income stream to fund the principal repayment. Technically, to be fair, you would need to fund the difference bewteen the £83.25 interest-only loan payments and the £294.50 repayment payments by depleting the savings principal, which in turn would reduce the amount of savings interest earned, by almost half.
Bottom line: You're always better off with the higher rate, except where it's important to retain liquidity.
Reply to
Ronald Raygun

Site Timeline Threads

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.