Premium Bond Diary - December & Year end update

3 x 50 cheques in December - better than nothing, although I am lagging behind what I could have earned in interest according to a recent Times article.

At the end of November 2003 I invested my 30,000 savings - mortgage deposit - in Premium Bonds. My aim being to see if I could get a better 'return' from the Bonds than from the interest I was receiving from my building society.

Buying the Bonds in November meant that I was eligible for draws from January 1st 2004. So that is 850 for 12 months 'entry' in the Premium Bonds but technically 13 months of the money not gaining interest in a building society interest account.

So, November has to be that million pound cheque as it will be a full 12 months since the money was withdrawn from the BS, thereby losing me the interest, and invested in bonds. OK, a cheque for 5K or 10K will do nicely :-)

I will now decide what to do over Christmas. My current thinking is to withdraw the money in the first week of January and put the money into a savings account where, at least, the interest is guaranteed. I live in South Wales and it has struck me this year that, as far as I can see, only one person from South Wales has won a 'decent' prize - 5K - compared to a ridiculously high number of people in the South East of England winning such prizes and higher. Yes, admittedly, there are bound to be more bond holders in the South East due to a mixture of population numbers and wealth but I do wonder why places like Wales and the North of England do not feature more. Just an observation.

Winnings so far:

January 2004 1 x 50 cheque February 2004 1 x 50 cheque March 2004 3 x 50 cheques (150) April 2004 1 x 50 cheque May 2004 - NOTHING, NOT A JOT June 2004 - NOTHING, NOT A JOT July 2004 1 x 50 cheque August 2004 2 x 50 cheques (100) September 2004 3 x 50 cheques (150) October 2004 1 x 50 cheque November 2004 1 x 50 cheque December 2004 3 x 50 cheque (150)

Reply to
John Smith
Loading thread data ...

They do audit the distribution of wins I believe and they turn out to be in proportion to the geographical distribution of bond holders - many more in the south east. Similarly, there seem to be a lot of wins with newer bonds and not many wins with older bonds but this is because most bonds are relatively recently bought, not becuase the bonds go stale as some people deduce.

When you compare with BSoc interest rates remember that PBond prizes are not taxed.

Robert

Reply to
robertmlaws

"John Smith" wrote

So, you've done a fair bit better than the average would be - you've had 17 prizes! [Average is something like 15 prizes per year now, but at the start of the year was only about 12 prizes per year.]

Reply to
Tim

It would be almost miraculous if your premium bond winnings came exactlly to whatever the notional interest rate is, its almost certain you'll get either less or more than that. Therefore, there is a 50% chance you'll get less. Hopefully it will be a consolation to you that there are plenty of people who got more, in order to make up the averages. :-)

Presumably because you dont have a good statistical understanding of the population numbers, the income,and the propensity to buy premium bonds, of these different populations?

Reply to
Tumbleweed

Interesting.

Reply to
John Smith

Something tells me you are an anally challenged and not a very nice person IMPO. Sad, especialy at Christmas time but then it is sad at any time of the year.

Reply to
John Smith

In message , John Smith writes

I think you have answered your own question havent you?. The geographical split of wins are directly proportional to the numbers of bonds held.

Reply to
john boyle

And many of the older bonds will have been cashed in

Reply to
Angela

...

Looking at the nat savings web page, I see the notional interest rate is a paltry 3.2%. Obviously HMG have taken into account the tax that won't be paid, given that eg ING pay 5% (pre-tax) at present. It makes premium bonds not such a good idea for lower-rate taxpayers, I think.

Happy Christmas all!

Reply to
Mike Scott

...but for a 40% taxpayer the PBonds look quite good. 3.2% untaxed is equivanlent to 5.33% gross taxable, which is not too bad for a no-risk (fairly) rapid access investment.

Robert

Reply to
robertmlaws

wrote

Agreed.

wrote

You shouldn't think that premium bonds are "no-risk" - there is definitely a risk (on income, not capital) that you win no prizes!!

Reply to
Tim

Quite, although presumably with enough bonds you can expect near enough the 3.2% over a long period. I think what's bugging me is that HMG presents PBs as a wonderful *tax-free* "investment" - when in fact they've effectively deducted tax at source anyway. I'll save the choice epithets :-)

Reply to
Mike Scott

True - I look on them as a 'safe' form of gambling.

You never lose your stake and could possibly win big money (waits in hope!)

I don't think you can expect premium bonds to match what you could get from a decent savings account, but then there's always that chance...

Best Wishes,

Jeff

Reply to
Jeff

But you should think of your "stake" as the interest that you are losing by not having them in a good savings a/c (or whatever). Ignore the 30,000 (or whatever) which you have passed to NS&I (for "safekeeping") - you'll get that back later.

So, the bet is simply a stake of "lost interest" against possible winnings of whatever "prizes" you win.

"Jeff" wrote

Reply to
Tim

I notice the first 1 million winner of 2005 bought their ticket back in June

2004 - swine! :-))))
Reply to
John Smith

and three times as well as me.

I've had 5 wins in the last 12 months from my 20K. (unless that is postie has lost some - but how do I find out?)

I'm thinking of giving up this idea.

tim

Reply to
tim

In message , tim wrote

Go to the National Savings web site and type your Premium Bond holder's number in the box.

It will show all your wins in the last 6 draws.

Reply to
Alan

Thanks.

Worse than I thought. One win (see below).

So to compare with JS.....

20000 originally invested in 1999:

my 2004 went:

Jan: 50 pound win reinvested Feb: Nothing March: Nothing April: 50 pound win reinvested May: Nothing June: 50 pound win reinvested July: Nothing Aug: Nothing Sept: 50 pound win as a 'reserve' (whatever that is). This wasn't re invested and doesn't show up on the above web-site either. Oct: Nothing Nov: Nothing Dec: 50 pound win reinvested.

2003 wasn't any better. I have reinvestments certificates for July and Oct. I forgotten exactly which month I asked to start re-investment, March or April I think.

So 7*50 pounds in 20 months.

Now, who still thinks PBs are a sensible investment?

tim

Reply to
tim

A client who won 25,000 a few years ago. :)

Reply to
Doug Ramage

Or the one who bought in June and won a million on Saturday - the swine :-)

Reply to
John Smith

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.