Question re pension scheme

Hello, I am in a company pension scheme of the defined benefits/final salry type. I'm early forties and currently have a protected pensionable salary of just over £24k .My company is seeking to introduce a new scheme whereby this would be protected and would then only rise by RPI until i retire. Does this sound reasobable? Surely if i dont accept this arrangement, i could potentially drive my pesnion up as i still have another 20 years to work?

Thanks for comments

ste

Remove antispam and add 670 after bra to email

Reply to
tarquinlinbin
Loading thread data ...

Yes, you are right. Salaries have on average risen 1% to 2% a year more than the RPI, with promotional increases possible on top of that. Sounds like a cost-saving measure for your company. Is there no quid pro quo?

Reply to
GB

Basically i work a mix of normal daytimes and various shift patterns. This is all counted as pensionable pay. Overtime outside these arrangments is not counted. The company wants to move to an annualised hours system and abolish the concept of shift patterns. I.E a shift would be a "normal" work pattern. To me it seems all take and no give. In addition,it appears that others who do other job functions (eg office based) are not being asked to adopt the same pensionable pay protection mechanism. It sounds decidedly dodgy to me.

Remove antispam and add 670 after bra to email

Reply to
tarquinlinbin

Try one of the advice organisations

Daytona

Reply to
Daytona

Are you sure that it really is linked to the RPI? Check out whether there is some small print that means it rises at the RPI or, say, 5% pa whichever is the smaller. Mine does :-(

Robert

Reply to
Robert

Hmm,i.ll look at that. As a comparison, does £24k sound ok for someone who;s early forties and still has a bit to go?

Remove antispam and add 670 after bra to email

Reply to
tarquinlinbin

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.