Sun Tel: Secret council tax database penalises homes with a view

Secret council tax database penalises homes with a view

Patrick Hennessy and Ben Leapman Sunday Telegraph Last Updated: 2:05am GMT 23/03/2008

Millions of homes face higher council tax bills after being logged as having off-street parking or a pleasant view, The Sunday Telegraph can disclose.

Ministers have admitted that Government inspectors are building a secret database that will eventually cover all 23 million homes in England.

The revelations follow a week when council tax bills for 2008-09 have been landing on doormats all over the country. This week, the Government will confirm that some will have rises this year of up to 11 per cent, more than four times the rate of inflation. A Victorian terrace: Secret council tax database penalises homes with a view Eight million homes with off-street parking places have been identified. The database will eventually cover all 23 million homes in England

Families living in homes seen as having desirable features face significant increases after ministers complete their revaluation exercise, which they claim has been postponed indefinitely.

However, ministers have had to admit that eight million homes have been identified as having one or more off-street parking places with details of the exact number of spaces - from one to nine - kept on file. On top of this, 80,000 homes have been officially recorded as having the "value significant" feature of a scenic view.

Again, precise details of whether the view is of the sea, hills, mountains, lakes, fields or golf courses have been recorded. Different codes are provided for a "partial view" and a "full view".

Last night, Eric Pickles, the Conservative local government spokesman, said: "This is new evidence of the Government's great council tax cover-up. Ministers' claims that the revaluation in England was postponed have been completely shredded. advertisement

"Every home is being sized up, and every home improvement or sign of a nice neighbourhood is slowly being photographed, catalogued and taxed by Gordon Brown's inspectors.

"Families face soaring bills for the crime of living in a nice neighbourhood. Only Labour would think of taxing people for looking out of their windows."

Details about the logging of homes with a view and off-street parking came from answers to Tory parliamentary questions given by Jane Kennedy, John Healey and Phil Woolas, all ministers either at the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG), the Treasury or the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

Last month, The Sunday Telegraph revealed how ministers had tried to cover up official documents showing that tens of thousands of homes were placed the wrong tax bands, with many again facing the prospect of higher bills after revaluation.

Council tax has been a source of controversy since Labour came to power, with the typical household in a Band D home paying £1,078 in 2007 compared with £564 in 1997.

Research by this newspaper established that, this year, some homes will see their bill rise by up to 11 per cent - despite an announcement by ministers that local authorities would face a 5 per cent "cap" on their demands. However, the cap did not affect police authorities, many of which have imposed bigger rises for their section of the bills to avoid having to lose police jobs.

In parts of Lincolnshire, bills will rise by more than 11 per cent, next week's figures from the DCLG will show. The average bill, however, will increase by less than 4 per cent, say Whitehall insiders.

The Government's preferred measure of inflation, the Consumer Price Index, stands at 2.5 per cent, although the Retail Price Index is 4.1 per cent.

A DCLG spokesman said: "We have made clear many times there are no plans for a revaluation, and there is no revaluation by stealth. This means no one can be penalised for improving their home, off-street parking or having a scenic view.

"The Valuation Office Agency is simply maintaining an accurate council tax valuation list."

formatting link

Reply to
Papadillos
Loading thread data ...

"Papadillos" wrote

What's the big surprise? As a property's council tax band is based on its value, and that value is affected by such things as "a nice view" and off-street parking, everyone should expect that the council tax could be higher if you have any of those "desirable features"...

Reply to
Tim

Yep. I really cannot understand the newspapers' obsession with this issue.

It's fine to argue about whether there should be a revaluation or not. But it's nuts to nit-pick over how it the value is to be obtained, especially given that everyone agrees the previous method was a joke.

tim

Reply to
tim (not at home)

It's simple. It's the game of political scaremongering. Tory central office knows it's a hot potato that ordinary folk don't really understand. So all they have to do is pick up on some procedural aspect of council tax - neglecting to mention much of it is little different from when they were last in power - then twist it into something sinister and surreptitious, and toss it to the press in the hope of feeding the general populace's paranoia. No matter that they have expressed no plans to do anything different when they come back to power; spread enough FUD, and eventually come polling day, some of it will have stuck. That's the game.

Reply to
Wayne Stuart

It's simple. It's the game of political scaremongering. Tory central office knows it's a hot potato that ordinary folk don't really understand. So all they have to do is pick up on some procedural aspect of council tax - neglecting to mention much of it is little different from when they were last in power - then twist it into something sinister and surreptitious, and toss it to the press in the hope of feeding the general populace's paranoia. No matter that they have expressed no plans to do anything different when they come back to power; spread enough FUD, and eventually come polling day, some of it will have stuck. That's the game.

Reply to
Terry D

This is nothing less than a Communist conspiracy.

We have lived in the same house for 40 years. Now we are on a fixed income. We can no more afford to pay more council tax than we can afford fancy dinners out or holidays abroad or a car. Our neighbours are all johnny-come-latelys with big money from the City.

The only way out is death.

Reply to
alfikrim

This skips over one simple issue; you don't know how much poll tax would be today if it still existed. Back in the day, councils' subsidies from central government funds were much higher, meaning nowadays, councils need to make up much more of their funding from local taxes. As such, if they still had poll tax, it would need to have been massively increased from how much we remember it, just as council tax has, and just as any proposed replacement distribution system would be.

Reply to
Wayne Stuart

I agree because this would be a fairer method of proportioning the taxation. I hated the Poll tax system that you referred to because it made little account of individuals ability to pay. Neither does the current council tax system.

(BTW - please quote previous posts properly - I had to cut and paste to quote yours).

M.

Reply to
Mark

Sorry. but I wasn't aware that I hadn't quoted previous posts properly. I apologise and grovel profusely for not conforming to your silly newsgroup protocol and I'm so sorry that you had to cut and paste. In fact, proper quoting of previous messages is about no. 99999 on my "to do" list. Please get a life!

TD

Reply to
Terry D

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.