In search for an "opinion letter" in accounting principles in Canada

Apr 10, 2005 0 Replies

A strange story about a "ghost" Canadian Company. A Company which approved its past Annual Reports even though it had been delared "dissolved" by the Ministry of Finance of British Columbia.



Better reading at:



formatting link
I am in search for an advisor who can certify that these reports were false.



Thank you,



PS



----------------------------------------------------------------------------



-------------------------------------------



The Strange Story of the Accounting Firm



SaveSome Corporation (Vancouver - British Columbia, Canada)


Just a few months ago a very "special" service company was active in Vancouver, the SaveSome Corporation. The Accounting Division of the Company was active since 1998.


This Company was used to declare in its Web Site that "We are professionals and certified CA, CMA and CGA Accountants". See the link:


http://64.233.183.104/search?qÊche:38btFS-ANF4J:

formatting link


I made a check about this statement, but none of the British Columbia Accounting Associations recognized the SaveSome Corporation and Mr. H. K. (its Accountant) as members of their organizations. Was that an unauthorized statement? Apparently it was. Could such an (apparently) unauthorized statement bring to any legal consequences? I do not have any idea about it. But if this statement was not unauthorized, then the problem around this Company would be even more serious, as I am going to demonstrate.


The Accounting Division of this Company prepared the Financial Statements



2000-2001-2002 for a Manufacturing Company incorporated in Vancouver in year
2000. And that is why I am interested in it: this Manufacturing Company had an Italian company as its 50% shareholder. And I am a shareholder of the Italian Company.


This Manufacturing Company incorporated in Vancouver was also one of the so called "Related Companies" of the SaveSome Corporation which prepared its Financial Statements. See the link:


http://64.233.183.104/search?qÊche:X5sbnYIxkeMJ:

formatting link


What is the true meaning of "related" for two different companies? Friend to? Close to? What else? Surely not "controlled". The Manufacturing Company was controlled officially by different shareholders (50% by an Italian Company and 50% by a Korean manager).


And let's come to the key issue of this story: the 2000-2001-2002 Financial Statements were clearly false. Nethertheless they were approved by the shareholders of the Company in May 2004 as they were reliable Annual Reports for the years 2000-2001-2002. In fact, in July 2003 the Manufacturing Company had been declared "dissolved" by the Ministry of Finance of British Columbia for having failed to file in the previous years. This was confirmed to me in writing by the Minister of Finance of B.C., Honourable Colin Hansen. So, probably for the first time in the story of Canadian corporations, a company "dissolved" in year 2003 approved its past Annual Reports (2000-2001-2002) in year 2004. Fantastic example of juridical creativity!


Were there any additional reasons to conclude that these Annual Reports were clearly false? Yes, there were:


1) most of the figures were strangely "rounded" at one hundred or one thousand dollars: this happens in business plans not in Annual Reports and not in real accounting;


2) in the calculation of the "cost of goods sold", the Accountant subtracted the "stock" of inventory and not the "change in inventory" (unbelievable mistake)


3) the amortization cost is missing in year 2001


4) corporate taxes are missing and gross income before taxes is equal to net income after taxes (a true "Paradise": in British Columbia they do not seem to pay any corporate taxes)


5) fixed assets net of amortization fluctuate in the years but are the same figures in years 2000 and 2002 (truly unrealistic)


6) ending equity of year x and beginning equity of year x+1 are different (sic!)


7) curiously, the ending capitals (net equity) at the end of 2000 and
2002 are perfectly equal ($77.579), which, again, is pretty unrealistic.


You can find these "Reports", signed by Mr. Kadir, here below:


Financial Statements prepared by the Vancouver Accounting Company


formatting link
which declared that it used certified CA, CMA and CGA accountants.


INCOME STATEMENT 2000



2001
2002









Revenue



80.000
79.700
172.000









Purchases



-14.000



-18.000



-35.000


Delivery & Freight



-1.800



-4.500



-7.400


Materials & Supplies



-2.500



-7.500



-10.000


Subcontractors/Assembly Costs



-8.000



-12.000



-14.000


Cost of Goods Sold



-26.300



-42.000



-66.400


Less: Inventory



-2.000



-1.000



-2.000


Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required