Insights/Questions about the macroeconomics of Societe Generale's Rogue Trader

Jérôme Kerviel was a rogue trader at Societe Generale (SG). His trades cost the firm about $7.2B. However, there must have been a myriad of companies that profited from these trades. I would think
that there were, let's say for argument's sake, that 1000 companies saved about $7,200 (or increased their earnings by this same amount). If my hypothesis is correct, than which companies profited?
It seems that the markets punished share prices when *ONE* company lost billions of dollars, but they did *NOT* reward as much the shares of the many companies that profited by a few millions here and there. Another words:
The reduction in market capitalization of SG < The aggregate gains of all the companies which profited from these rogue dealings.
Please clarify and enrich us with questions/comments.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
Add image file
Upload is a site by and for consumers of financial services and advice. We are not affiliated with any of the banks, financial services or software manufacturers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.

Tax and financial advice you come across on this site is freely given by your peers and professionals on their own time and out of the kindness of their hearts. We can guarantee neither accuracy of such advice nor its applicability for your situation. Simply put, you are fully responsible for the results of using information from this site in real life situations.