Jérôme Kerviel was a rogue trader at Societe Generale (SG). His trades cost the firm about $7.2B. However, there must have been a myriad of companies that profited from these trades. I would think that there were, let's say for argument's sake, that 1000 companies saved about $7,200 (or increased their earnings by this same amount). If my hypothesis is correct, than which companies profited? It seems that the markets punished share prices when *ONE* company lost billions of dollars, but they did *NOT* reward as much the shares of the many companies that profited by a few millions here and there. Another words: The reduction in market capitalization of SG < The aggregate gains of all the companies which profited from these rogue dealings. Please clarify and enrich us with questions/comments.
Another words, I'm trying to figure out if, overall, the economic ecosystem neither profited or suffered from this big fiasco (is there a conservation of economic benefits)? Did all those companies earn a bit from that $7.2B at the expense of SG? If so, was their earnings greater than the losses suffered by SG?