Given that, would language in a will saying something like "...everything to my spouse, except that anything she disclaims goes to the Foobar Family Trust" (assume that language is valid in the state the will is drawn under) successfully allow the surviving spouse to choose how much of the decedent's estate tax exemption she wishes to "waste" in return for outright ownership of more assets? By "successful" I mean that the disclaimed amount will *not* be considered part of the unlimited marital exemption?
Reason why I am asking -- as you all know, a common estate-planning device is to use a trust to preserve the decedent's estate tax exemption even if (say) he wanted it all to go to the spouse. So if the decedent died with $3mil of assets at a time where the exemption shielded $1mil from the estate tax, he'd put $1mil into the trust and leave the remaining $2mil to the spouse.
The problem (to me) of doing this inflexibly (by having the will specify an actually dollar amount or by reference to the currently in-effect exemption amount) is that due to increases in the exemption, bad investment performance, etc., that approach might leave the spouse with far less outright ownership than was intended. For example, say that at death the decedent's assets were only $1,100,000. Then $1,000,000 would go into the trust and the spouse would only own $100,000 outright.
The idea of the disclaimer would be to let the surviving spouse set her desired balance between preserving the exemption and outright ownership rather than leaving it to the static words in the will.
Thus the question if whether from an estate tax perspective the disclaimer approach will work.
-- Rich Carreiro firstname.lastname@example.org