This mainly affects states in which they weren't already protected (apparently only a small subset of them), but the Supreme Court ruled today that funds in IRAs are "exempt under federal bankruptcy law to the extent that they are necessary for the debtor's financial support".
I'm not sure exactly what constitutes that second clause - does it, say, not protect IRA money belonging to a working
30-year-old?Nevertheless, it's an interesting ruling and, if anything, simply strengthens the case for putting as much into one's IRA as possible in general.
One of many articles you'll see about this starting to appear:
-----