Merger of same mutual fund to a different class

This has been discussed a few times, but I can't seem to get this to work.

Schwab recently collapsed their mutual funds getting rid of some classes of the SAME fund.

I held fund "SCHAAA" which is now fund "SCHBBB" (same mutual fund name, different symbol - see

formatting link
Their FAQs indicate "These symbol changes are part of share class collapses that are considered to be tax-free for U.S. Federal income tax purposes." So it is NOT a sell and repurchase, since I lose the cost basis and it's not a taxable event.

Schwab's website sez I sold (example to get the point across) 1000.00 shares of SCHAAA and bought 999.990 shares of SCHBBB, a slightly less number.

I tried a stock split using the number of old shares (ex: 1000.000) and the # of new shares (999.990), but Quicken changed the number of new shares to a slightly different number (eg: 999.998323) which I assume is some sort of round off error. So my number of shares don't quite match Schwab's website - darn close, but not correct. And I know this will bite me at the end.

I suppose since I don't use Q to calculate cost basis, I could indeed simply 'sell' and 'buy', but then my price history won't be right.

Any ideas??

Reply to
Andrew
Loading thread data ...

formatting link

I think the Corporate Acquisition transaction is the most frequently used "solution" in this situation. It is probably not an ideal solution, but I think it usually works.

But since it too, like the Stock Split transaction, requires giving Quicken a ratio to use to compute the number of new shares you'll have; it too may not get the number of new shares exactly correct (though I think you should be free to experiment with the ratio to see if you can find one that will create the correct number of new shares - 1000.000/999.991, for example). If no ratio produces the exact number of new shares correctly, I don't see why you can't just enter an "adjustment" (an Add Shares, or Remove Shares) to get the share balance correct.

Reply to
John Pollard

formatting link
>

Thanks John - I'll give that a try - I was thinking about the adjustment as well. Appreciate it. Enjoy the rest of the little summer we have left.

Reply to
Andrew

Good point - along with some prominent comments indicating it was a repurchase of essentially the same security to keep my records straight, but indeed work. Thanks Tom.

Reply to
Andrew

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.