Is this reimbursement really taxable income?

Background: Last summer the Los Angeles Hyperion plant had an incident which resulted in a large sewage spill and odors affecting nearby homeowners. The plant offered affected homeowners a choice of (A) Reimbursement of hotel expenses while staying away from their homes. (B) Reimbursement of up to $1200 for the purchase of air conditioners so they could remain in their homes and close the windows. Program description:

formatting link
Come tax time, we receive a 1099-Misc for the $1200 as "Other Income". Is this type of reimbursement properly classified as taxable income?

If not, what would be the appropriate way to handle this on the income tax forms?

Reply to
Tom Russ
Loading thread data ...

The homeowners should have gotten their own air conditioners first, and been reimbursed for them afterwards. In that case it wouldn't be income - it would have been a reimbursement. But taking the money (or air conditioners) first is taxable income because the program doesn't specify that it's reimbursement for anything that would make it non- taxable.

I guess another option would have been to say the "incident" caused physical personal injuries (however small) and this was to compensate them for the injuries. That would have been tax free.

But being given money or air conditioners due to an "inconvenience" is very likely taxable.

Reply to
Stuart O. Bronstein

The format of the program was for the homeowners to purchase air conditioner units themselves, present receipts and and apply for reimbursement afterwards. From the program description:

"Option 1. Air conditioner unit(s) LA Sanitation & Environment will reimburse residential households for air conditioning units (defined as air conditioners, fans, air purifiers, air filters, and installation) if they don?t already have them. There is a $600 limit per household for homes 1000 square feet or smaller and a $1200 limit per household for homes above 1000 square feet. Receipts will be required within 14 days of purchase. This offer is valid July 12, 2021 through 11:59pm September 23, 20021 unless otherwise extended in writing by the City of Los Angeles."

I don't know if that affects the analysis.

Reply to
Tom Russ

Why wouldn't this be considered a gift? After all, the homeowner is doing nothing in return to "earn" the $1200. I always considered the difference between a gift and income is that a gift is something given to someone with no expectation of getting anything in return. On the other hand, income is paid to reward some kind of effort or action by the recipient. In this case, it seems the homeowner does nothing to "earn" the $1200 and the provider of the money is seemingly getting nothing in return. So why is this not a gift?

--

Reply to
Rick

Generally only humans are allowed to make gifts from a tax standpoint. And it's only a gift if it comes from disinterested sense of generosity. These payments were for a specific purpose, not out of pure generosity. Income tax is imposed in any accession to wealth that is not subject to an exception. It has nothing to do with working for it.

Reply to
Stuart O. Bronstein

Just following up on this thread because I cannot seem to get a decent answer. How did y'all handle this on your taxes? I don't understand why I am having to pay 22% in taxes on a reimbursment.

Please help!

Reply to
Alana Rung

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.