I find all the rules and regs about address verification, money laundering etc all a bit bizarre, but how about this situation...
My wife has had a building soc account since 1997, hasn't used it since
2003, and recently posted them her passbook along with a letter requesting a withdrawal (as a cheque).What happens? Today she gets a letter back stating that (a) the account has been classified 'dormant' (after 2 years??) and that (b) consequently, address verification will be required again before withdrawal is permitted.
Eh? The address which they verified back in 1997 and printed on the passbook is the same one we are living at now; the same one written on the letter my wife wrote; and the same to which the BS have just posted back her passbook.
Can this really be correct procedure - are they following anti-laundering legislation or just some internal procedure? And what can the purpose possibly be? Or have they just lost the plot?
David