My son who is thirty years old has not had much use for a car of his own so has often used mine when needed and so has been included on my insurance. He now needs a car of his own, and when looking at the insurance costs finds he is quoted about 800 a year even for an old 2002 Honda Civic which is only worth 1300 or so. And that's looking at the cheapest quotes on the price comparison sites out of moneysavingexpertcom.
He was told by one company he rang, that his premium was high since he had no 'no-claims' bonus. That's despite driving accident free since he was seventeen, but its because he had no car insurance in his own name.
Is there any way that it could be arranged to try and bring his premium down? I don't mind including him on my insurance if that would help, or is there any other way that we could usefully try? Thanks.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks to all for the contributions, but somehow I don't feel I have made much progress, like the chap who posted who was in a similar situation who said he had tried every which way, with no success.
Insurance companies ignoring that my son has had 15 years driving driving with no claims and treating him like a first time driver seems to me like the insurance companies are behaving like the Bankers who have been accused of having a false sense of * entitlement *, i.e. just helping themselves.
Insurance companies with a little collusion amongst themselves could be printing money, since they know we need by law to have insurance.
I've heard it said insurance premiums have gone through the roof, due to visitors staging accidents to make false claims. I dont know if that's true or just another excuse for greed.
I wonder if there might be a time for setting up companies like the old 'mutual' help Societies, like the original Building Societies sprang out of. Companies set up with some careful 'vetting' of customers which sorted out the high risk from the low risk in car insurance terms would bring premiums right down, wouldn't you think?
It makes me wonder what the legal requirements would be for setting up a motor insurance company? If low risk drivers were asked to deposit a sum of money beforehand in case they made a claim (which they would get back on leaving the company) it would make it quite a low risk company to set up I would think?