Cheque "Clearance" was: Does this sound like a scam?

Nov 21, 2005 11 Replies

In article , IanAl writes


>
>>It is a well-known scam. (Who in their right mind would pay £3335 in
>>shipping on an unseen £150 car that has the steering-wheel on the >>wrong side?) >>
>>What will happen is that the cheque will clear *your* bank and you
>>will think that the funds are yours. But they are not, because the
>>cheque can be refused by the issuing bank *after* the funds have
>>cleared your bank, and you have sent £3335 to the scammer. You bank
>>will then deduct the full £3485 from your account after the cheque >>finally bounces.
>>
>>The police may be interested.
>
>So how/when can you be sure that any cheque has safely been paid?

After 6 years from the time the money is credited at the very longest. But IANAL


However, I suppose that would not stop your bank applying an "offset" if they hold other funds belonging to you.


uk.finance added

In message , Mr X writes

The only way to be sure that a cheque is 'paid' (which is not the same thing as it being 'cleared', is to get the collecting bank to contact the drawee (i.e. the bank upon whom the cheque was drawn) and ask if the cheque has been paid. If they say 'yes' then they cant go back on it and the cheque cant be subsequently bounced.

'Cleared' merely means that the collecting bank have had some dosh from the drawee, but this can be reclaimed but this cant happen if the drawee has confirmed that the cheque has been paid.

...sense of deja vue on this topic...again :-)

In message , Tumbleweed writes

Yes! 'Cut & Paste' saves so much time! :-)

In article , Tumbleweed writes

Because it's an FAQ...

In article , john boyle writes

Thank you for an authoritative answer

why not use one of those 'we cash all cheques ' places ?

mrcheerful

thats a deja vue as well!

the answer is, because they will have all your details and thus be able to come after you. And they will.

Is this true even if the cheque later turns out to be forged, altered, etc?

I'd have thought the last sentence was unambigous? If they could go back on it, then paid wouldnt actually mean anything would it.

Though,as previously discussed here, very few banks, if any, appear to actually operate a service that will do this , especially in writing.

In message , s snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com writes

Yes. The parties may then wish to sue of course.

In message , Tumbleweed writes

Any bank will do it if they are telephoned by the collecting bank.

Thats true though!

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required