Just received my new Tax Coding Notice from those good people at HMRC and they've deducted £800 for use of a company car.
Erm, news to me.
Anyone know what "car" would attract such a low deduction anyway? £800 = £160 at basic rate, £13 a month?
Or have HMRC just plucked a number out of the sky?
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
S
Sunny Bard
A Renault Twingo 1.2 Bizu with £1500 worth of fitted options?
R
Ronald Raygun
Are you saying you don't (didn't) have use of a company car? If they've made a mistake, then obviously you should tell them.
One could have had use of the company car for only part of the tax year 2009-10. The charge would then be pro-rated. For example, if the normal company car charge would have been £4800 for the whole year, then £800 would represent the charge for 2 months' use.
The adjustment to your tax code would be a means of collecting extra tax due for 2009-10, and is not in respect of anticipated use during
2010-11, though I don't quite understand why they wouldn't also make such an adjustment, unless the period of availability of the car ended before 5th April 2010.
R
Rasta Pickles
I did have a company car in my previous employment (which ended in August 2010) but my tax code during that employment reflected the fact.
T
Tim Jackson
Your tax code for the whole tax year 2010-11 should reflect that. That includes the code used by your new employer.
As long as they have apportioned it correctly, this will ensure that the right amount of tax is deducted. If you have the right code, the tax tables spread the tax charge out evenly over the whole year, despite the fact that you only had the benefit until August.
However, check what code your new employer has been using. If it is the one they got from your P45 from your old employer, then you have probably been paying tax as if you still had the car. Assuming your new employer uses the new tax code before the end of the current tax year, then the effect should be that you get a refund in your next pay packet. If not, you should claim a refund direct from the taxman after the end of the tax year.
If on the other hand this is your notice of coding for 2011-12, and it duplicates the charge in your tax code for 2010-11, then that's a mistake. You should ask your tax office to correct it.
R
Rasta Pickles
My tax code from November (when I started work again) - now has been W1657L.
But I should only be taxed for the usage, yes? So, for example, say the taxable benefit was £1200 and I had that benefit until the end of August (5 months) then the taxable benefit would be 5/12 of £1200, i.e £500?
I think they used a P46(?) because I was awaiting my P45. But it's definitely W1657L.
T
Tim Jackson
I think you've been on an emergency tax code. I'm guessing that it has been 657L and that it's been on a W1 (week 1) basis - i.e. there should be a space between the W1 and the 657L.
An emergency tax code just gives you the basic personal allowance that eveyone gets, but nothing else. Slightly odd that it is 657L, since the personal allowance would be coded as 647L.
Week 1 basis means that they are assuming you had a job earlier in the tax year and paid tax and received the personal allowance there. So they have only been giving you an appropriate proportion of the personal allowance, on a week-by-week or month-by-month basis, not the full amount for the whole year.
formatting link
If the taxman has got it right, the effect of your new tax code will be to deduct the correct amount of tax in your next pay packet, instead of the emergency amount. Essentially, what they are doing is chasing the information that would have enabled your new employer to get it right from the start, had they had your P45. If they've got it right, you may get a refund in your next pay packet, or there may be more to pay, depending on your circumstances.
It sounds like you had a gap in your employment from August to November, which would point towards a refund. The emergency code would have assumed that you got 1/12 of the personal allowance in September and October, but in fact you didn't because you weren't working - so the taxman owes you.
But if deductions have also caught up with you, that may tip the balance in the opposite direction. And if you had any other income between August and November, that would also affect the calculation, and you should declare it to the taxman.
Since the sum total of the tax you paid via your old employer and your new employer should add up to the correct amount of tax for the year, it's definitely worth checking and claiming a refund after the end of the tax year if necessary. Your old employer may have deducted too much tax, since he didn't know that you would be giving up the company car part way through the year.
The question is whether the information about the amount of tax deducted by the old employer has filtered through to the new one. If so, then you will also be due a refund (via the new employer) for the overpaid tax on the company car. If not, you will have to claim it back from the taxman. Your problem will be that your payslip won't tell you how any refund is derived (and your new employer won't know either).
Yes. You said earlier it was 800, which would suggest that the taxable benefit for the full year would have been 1920. (1920 x 5/12 = 800) The fraction 5/12 may be approximate, of course.
R
Rasta Pickles
Apologies, I've been doing some work on my wife's tax, hers is 657L.
Mine is W1647L (no spaces).
I did some self-employed work between August and October and have registered for self-assessment. The girl on the phone didn't seem overly bothered when I informed them in October, I'm sure she said something like "you've got until July next year to inform us officially".....something along those lines!
And I had income of 6 x £65.45 JSA between October and November which, apparently, is taxable as well.
The car benefit in my previous employment was £2024 which gave me a tax code of 444L - my coding for next year is 7475 - 800 car benefit 667L.
The notes on the back of the form simply tell me that they "understand" that I have a company car provided by .
They don't make life easy, do they?
T
Tim Jackson
It sounds as if there will definitely be some clearing up to do after the end of the tax year.
I expect you'll get a self-assessment tax return to fill in. On this you should put your all your income and allowances for the whole 2010-
2011 tax year:
- self-employment income and expenditure
- your JSA
- your pay from both the old and the new employers
- all your benefits in kind (including the value of the 5 months-worth of company car)
- any other income, e.g. bank interest, dividends on shares, property income (if any)
- and any other allowances that you might be entitled to.
For the company car, your old employer should send you a form P11D after the end of the tax year, which tells you how much it was worth, and any other benefits in kind you received. Chase him for it if you haven't received it by about the end of May. Copy this value into your tax return, rather than trying to make an estimate of the value.
It should then all work out in the end, even if your PAYE for the old and new employers isn't right. You may be due a refund on the PAYE, but that would be set against what you owe on your self-employment profits and JSA, so you might not see it in the bigger calculation!
No, they don't. If they think you've got a company car next year, you need to go back and tell them you haven't. They should then issue a new notice of coding for next year, without the 800 deduction.
They should perhaps also give you a revised code for the current tax year, reflecting the fact that you've not had a company car since August. But the tax year is nearly over now, so the chances are that it wouldn't hit your new employer's payroll department soon enough for them to take account of it this year. I think you will end up sorting it out through your tax return.
R
Rasta Pickles
Thanks for all the guidance, much appreciated.
Yes, it's all a bit messy:
five months of employment under PAYE with a company car six weeks of self-employment, car parking and mileage allowances thrown in six weeks of JSA the rest of the tax year back in PAYE employment on a strange tax code
Happy days :-)
R
Rasta Pickles
Just an update, after I'd prodded them, a new tax code arrived today.
"It's probably from a previous employment" was the excuse offered when I queried it. Even better, when I asked "um, should that happen?" I was told "well no but it's the system".
Amazing how "the system" always works in favour of the UK Govt innit?
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.