I'm trying to plug a few holes in my understanding of index-linked investments and tracker funds etc, in order to understand which ones provide the best hedge against inflation, and which of them cause the greatest losses if you liquidate them early. Can anyone clarify a few points?
With gilts, they generally pay two dividends a year which are linked to the retail price index, and then the capital sum, when repaid is also adjusted in line with the RPI, yes?
What happens if inflation is, say 2% p.a. when one buys the gilt, and
2% at maturity date, but has risen to 30% p.a. some time in-between? Will the capital repayment adjustment take that into account?Is the RPI an accurate measure of inflation?
If one cashes in the gilt before maturity, say just after receiving the first dividend payment - what does one stand to lose? Is it that they only pay back the original sum, unadjusted, if you cash in before it matures?
Other forms of infaltion-proof (more or less) investments: -
I've read about index-linked ETFs and tracker ETFs, which one can buy into via a stock broker. Am I right in understanding that these always lag behind the index they are tracking, so that in a period of inflation, one isn't really beating inflation at all?
If I invest in one of these, what which be the best index to be tracking?
At the end of the day, which is better, gilts or tracker EFTs?
Is there anything else - something that is almost guaranteed to
*genuinely* beat inflation?I've considered stocks, but I gather that even the top fund managers fail to beat the index, nine times out of ten, long-term, so the chances of me doing so must be almost nil! (Unless the random walk hypothesis is to be believed, in which case, I am subject to the same odds!)
Thank you for any insights...
JD Email address maintained for newsgroup use only, and not regularly monitored.. Messages sent to it may not be read for several weeks. PLEASE REPLY TO NEWSGROUP!