Home Information Packs mandatory from 1/6/7

NEWS RELEASE

Home Information Packs 'go-live' date announced ODPM News Release 2005/0233

17 November 2005

Home Information Packs, which are being introduced by Government to reform the home buying and selling process, will become mandatory from

1 June 2007.

Currently, one million pounds a day is wasted on failed transactions as buyers often spend hundreds of pounds on valuations, legal advice and searches on transactions that ultimately break down. By providing key information at the beginning of the process, Home Information Packs will prevent waste and significantly cut the number of sales that fall through. The Packs are expected to cost around £600 +VAT for the average home. Most of those costs are currently paid by the buyer.

Housing Minister, Yvette Cooper said,

?Too many sales fall through because of delays and late information, wasting money and causing great stress for buyers and sellers, that?s why we are introducing the Packs. We have been working with all parts of industry on the detail and this timetable will give them time to fully prepare?.

The Government expects that confirmation of an implementation date will act as a trigger to others who are waiting to begin their training as Home Inspectors as well as provide certainty to organisations who are already preparing to offer Home Information Packs to consumers on a voluntary basis.

To date, seven assessment centres have been established and 1700 people from the surveying and property industry and from other professions are undergoing training for the Home Inspector qualification, with hundreds in the pipeline, waiting for the implementation date to be announced. Research shortly to be published by ODPM will confirm the number of home inspectors expected to be required for June 2007 is between 5000 and 7400. The next steps for the programme is to establish a certification scheme which is required to provide quality assurance and manage the Home Condition Report and Home Inspector registers. It is expected this scheme will be operating by the summer of 2006. A ?dry run? will follow later in the year designed to provide assurance to the industry and the public in advance of mandatory introduction on 1June 2007.

Notes to Editors:

  1. Consumer Benefits:

Provide Transaction Improvements by reducing the abortive costs to consumers and the industry as well as reducing the number of failed transactions caused by survey or valuation inspection finding. Housing Stock Condition Improvements by a reduction in the incidence of unexpected repair bills and encouraging better maintenance of homes. Greater Consumer Choice by reducing the entry costs to first time buyers and creating a market of serious sellers.

  1. Cost of Home Information Packs:

The Packs will cost around £600 plus VAT, and most of this is not new cost. Included in this is the Home Condition Report, which is expected to be cost around £300, for an average home, plus VAT. The content of the pack includes searches and other information which is currently paid for by the buyer, If several buyers pursue the same home, then currently these costs are paid for several times rather than just once with the Home Information Pack.

  1. Market Impact:

Home Information Packs will make the market more efficient and certain. They will make home buying more affordable and sustainable for first time buyers, who will receive full information in packs without having to pay for it. Major players are now investing heavily in Home Information Pack systems and intend to market these well in advance of packs becoming mandatory. This means sellers and buyers will not have to wait until June 2007 before they can benefit from packs, and there is less likelihood of a ?spike? of properties coming to the market immediately before implementation of the mandatory scheme. Industry accepts that sellers will not pay up front for HIPs. Thus there is no impediment to sellers marketing their homes with HIPs both before and after implementation.

  1. Home Inspectors/Certification Scheme:

Only inspectors qualifying under a certification scheme approved by the Secretary of State will be able to prepare home condition reports. The scheme will be responsible for monitoring and auditing inspectors? work. This will be robust to ensure that standards are maintained. If inspectors fail to maintain the correct standard or act in a way that is partial to one party contrary to the rules of the scheme, their certification will be removed, along with that their ability to produce HCRs. Research on the number of Home Inspectors required provides a range of estimates of between 5000 and 7,400 based upon assumptions around numbers of HCRs required and Home Inspector productivity levels in liaison with the industry. Details of the assumptions are described in the full report, which will be published shortly. The report also highlights the need to continuously monitor and revisit the range estimates as more evidence on the assumptions and Home Inspectors working patterns becomes available.

  1. Home Condition Report:

The Home Condition Report will be an objective report on the condition of the property that buyers, sellers and lenders will have a legal right to rely on. Home Inspectors will have to have suitable insurance that will be backed up by insurance of last resort provided by the certification scheme.

  1. Integrated Government Policy Benefits

Home Information Packs link into the Government?s wider agenda including compliance with the EU directive for energy reports, contributing to energy efficiency education among consumers as well as contributing to more sustainable home ownership and communities.

  1. For background information please visit
    formatting link
Reply to
Daytona
Loading thread data ...

IANAL (and don't have a financial background)

Is it just me, or does this figure seem relatively insignificant ? - most houses these days are £150k upwards, so this, in reality, is a very small number of sales falling by the wayside.

I wonder if this also takes into account people who simply change their mind and decide not to move.

Can anyone take a wild guess at what these information packs will cost the entire housing market per annum, as I suspect it will far outstrip the cost of failed sales.

Reply to
Colin Wilson

eh?

the million pounds a day would have nothing to do with house prices, it would be number of sales that fall through, times the wasted cost on the sale....things like solicitors fees, survey costs, estate agents costs, etc. If that was 1000 per sale (400 each for buyer and seller and 200 for the estate agent to relist the house) , that would be 1,000 falling through a day.

Tw

Reply to
Tumbleweed

OK, I wasn`t sure how to interpret the headline figure - cheers

Reply to
Colin Wilson

In message , Daytona writes

At the governments £700 a time, this translates to around 500,000 transactions a year failing, with around 1,000,000+/- succeeding.

So £600+VAT, (probably another government underestimate), will be spent on every property which goes on the market, whether it proceeds to a sale or not.

I wonder how many people currently put houses on the market where nobody shows any interest, therefore no money is spent, and withdraw them from the market at no real cost to anyone. If it's 500,000 p.a., then one million pounds a day will be wasted...... due to the cost of the Home Information Pack.

Reply to
Richard Faulkner

Sorry, it doesn't qualify unless you either write a 500 line diatribe about how Gordon Browns actions will cause it, or a 20-point explanation giving the reasons why your theory overrides what is actually happening.

Reply to
Tumbleweed

In message , Tumbleweed writes

Bollocks!!

Reply to
Richard Faulkner

Sounds like you were very honest there. Pity more sellers and their agents aren't.

Though lease length is one of the basics the EA should be able to relay to a prospective buyer before the offer. It's the nitty gritty issues both parties solicitors get involved with once the conveyancing process gets underway which slows things down.

For example when I bought my flat earlier this year it took the solicitors weeks to sort out some buildings regs issue which the solicitors made a right meal out of. When I raised the question for the sellers solicitors as to why it was never picked up when they bought it so as they had the answers my ones were looking for, all I got back was that point was never addressed and was completely new to them.

And then the solicitors will no doubt find more questions you never expected to be asked.

Directly or through your friendly Estate Agent? I viewed around 25 properties around this time last year, in only two case I met the seller face to face. And in any case most EA I wouldn't trust, they are out there to make their few percent out of the sale, hide a lot of the facts away and go cold when you give them negative feedback.

And when I bought my flat earlier this year, despite that two previous sales had fallen through, my request to the EA for a copy of a survey which they had on file was promptly declined. At least with the HIP a prospective buyer has the chance to see a condition report before making a commitment.

Reply to
Phil Richards

And the buyer still pissed about at the last minute. They're a bit like women: no matter how much you give, or change, it's never quite right or enough - once you have dealt with enough buyers who shit on you, you reach the point where you have to give it back - unfortunately.

I sold a house in 1999 and, before it went on the market I got the following:

Structural engineers report Electricians report Gas installations report Timber and Damp report

After their survey, the buyers got the following:

As above.

Total waste of time and money on my part.

The day before exchange, they asked for a significant reduction because of work needed.

The trouble is that the report will be full of caveats and most buyers will not trust it.

All the other legal stuff will be a godsend, but the condition report is a government scam which we believe is designed to comply with some international global warming agreement - Kyoto?

Reply to
Richard Faulkner

In message , Phil Richards writes

This sort of thing seems too common, I suspect it is a factor of solicitors protecting their PI policies by ticking every box they can think of now, whereas previously they would have said 'who cares' regarding many things.

Presumably this survey was paid for by the aborted buyers, and sometimes they will go 'we paid £xxx for this, if they want to know what it said they should either pay us something for this one, or go and get their own.'

Reply to
me

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.