Icesave

I noticed this in Icesave terms and conditions: "In the absence of gross negligence, we will not be liable for any loss or damage incurred by you arising directly or indirectly out of us acting on telephone, email or facsimile instructions." See

This contrasts with this from Halifax online banking: "If a customer of our online service is a victim of online fraud, we guarantee that they won't lose any money from their account, and will always be reimbursed in full." See

This seems to be an absolutely crucial difference! I had intended to invest in IceSave but am now hesitating. Any opinions? thank you

Reply to
Nick
Loading thread data ...

First of all quoted Icesave T&C (9a) only refers to (non-secure) contact via telephone, email or facsimile. Normal instructions are submitted in a secure environment to which that particular clause is net relevent.

OTOH the Halifax T&C while seemingly offering protection requires you to

*prove* fraud in order to invoke the guarantee. Though a different scenario victims of PIN fraud are denied reimbursement because allegedly they must have comnpromised their PIN and were therefore negligent. If you trust Halifax et al to interpret online fraud differently, bank on.

Jim A

Reply to
Jim Alexander

I wonder if simply refusing reimbursement on the basis of alleged negligence on the customer's part allows the banks to legitimately claim that chip and pin has reduced the cost of credit card fraud?....hmmmm

Reestit Mutton

Reply to
Reestit Mutton

"Out of us acting"? I hope that any judge would throw that out as being nonsensical English and, hence, void.

Should be "as a consequence of OUR acting".

hehe

Reply to
GPG

"Jim Alexander" wrote

But how do you ensure that any fraudster only uses the "secure environment", and doesn't "telephone, email or fax" their fraudulent instructions to Icesave?

Reply to
Tim

This is precisely my concern. What is to stop a fraudster emailing new personal details (bank account, address etc) and then transferring the contents of the account? I am concerned that the Icesave T&C do not specifically cover this point in legalese.

Reply to
Nick

This is precisely my concern. What is to stop a fraudster emailing new personal details (bank account, address etc) and then transferring the contents of the account? I am concerned that the Icesave T&C do not specifically cover this point in legalese.

Reply to
Nick

This is precisely my concern. What is to stop a fraudster emailing new personal details (bank account, address etc) and then transferring the contents of the account? I am concerned that the Icesave T&C do not specifically cover this point in legalese.

Reply to
Nick

First of all the OP cited an irrelevant comparision which read to me like a puff for Halifax, but the first point is an interesting point. It is a slightly curious clause tucked away in the Miscellaneous section. Set against Clause 4(c) not totally sure what it means, maybe the OP should ask Icesave.

Icesave withdrawals can only be made to a (pre) nominated account which to the best of my knowledge can only be changed by the postal submission of a signed form which is subsequently confirmed to the account holder's registered mail address. ISTM that the risk of fraud is about as low as practicable for online banking.

Halifax OTOH allows a payment out to be setup online. Yes, a more capable differerent beast but make your own judgement about the risk.

Jim A

Reply to
Jim Alexander

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.