Missing: hard drive containing Bitcoins worth 4m pounds in Newport landfill site

Nov 28, 2013 25 Replies

et al.



This guy works in IT, but he doesn't seem to have heard that it's extremely unwise to dump or recycle hard drives unless they have first had any data they contain rendered completely unreadable (least by being totally wiped - or if you're really paranoid, by physical damage).


Perhaps there was nothing on the drive that was worth securely wiping.

It's the Bitcoins he's lost that are his main concern.

Chris

Of course, he hasn't lost millions, he has just failed to profit from his small investment.

*Remember bitcoins can go down as well as up... but not usually under 3 feet of trash in an area the size of a football pitch.

One cannot but feel a degree of sympathy for him.

However, he should look on the bright side. He did not have to work for £4.5m worth of assets. He got nothing for them. The guy who presumably would have paid him £4.5 m for them still has his money in his pocket. There are no losers.

So if I lost a winning lottery ticket for £4.5M, no one would have lost anything? By that reckoning, even the £1 I paid for the ticket wasn't 'lost', as it went go into the coffers of those running the lottery - as would the £4.5M that I couldn't claim. [OK, there may still be ways of claiming it, but let's not get side-tracked.]

Surely it would be well worth mining an area that small for an item worth £4m? It's an employment opportunity.

Even if they recovered the hard drive, the electronics would probably be knackered. It would a specialist recovery to get the data off the disk.

Another question I ask myself - "What's a hard drive doing in landfill?" Presumably its owner simply threw it in his rubbish bin (or the recycling facility 'household waste skip'), rather than put it in the electronics/electrical recycling area?

well of course

the stupid system that HMG introduced to comply with WEEE just discourages compliance

(and to save you asking - yes!)

tim

That depends entirely what the HDD was used for. Not every computer HDD contains personal information that would do any harm if it fell into the wrong hands. I have HDDs that have only ever been used to store movies. If I were to throw any of those away, I wouldn't bother wiping or destroying them. Such archiving drives are often cheap and slow, and can take *days* to wipe.

He need have no fears about someone finding the HDD and taking his money. Anyone who finds the drive and realises what it's worth would

*have* to contact him and make some sort of deal in order to get the password to the bitcoin wallet (provided the guy can remember it). Without the password the wallet is useless.

Not that I would expect the HDD to still work after being in a landfill site for 14 years. Hard drives have breather holes through which water will seep in, so the innards are probably irretrievable corroded by now.

And imagine how he would feel if he undertakes months of searching and

*does* find his HDD, spends the money and effort to recover the data from the corroded drive, only to find that he cannot recall the password he used!

What's the odds of finding the HDD in a working or recoverable state? After 14 years of being buried, IMO very, very slim.

You mean 14 weeks? As long as the platters are intact, the data should be recoverable. So, I think it might be okay. It will have gone through the compacter on the rubbish truck, but unless it got sliced in half, I'd expect an aluminium casting to stand up to that.

In this case it was most likely a stupid system introduced by the local authority. If ours are typical one would have a 3 mile drive up a country road in order to deposit a hard drive in the small electrical products skip. No bus service and even if there were the site does not permit pedestrians. My old drives get a drill through the platters then go in the bin in a plastic bag with all the rest of the rubbish.

TBH I have stopped bothering to recycle. The local authority now make it so difficult it isn't worth the bother for the small amounts we used to do.

Sorry, I misread that he had *dumped* it in 2009 rather than that being the date he stopped using it. Yes, in that case a reasonable chance, though I'd not put it at "good".

Which you have told me twice.

I misread the article as I have now also said twice.

Cynic put finger to keyboard:

Yeah, but you've not explained how something dumped in 2009 has been there

14 years :-)

And trashing the drive before dumping it wouldn't have helped.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required