A couple of observations:
- The ZOPA exec team As it happens, I have worked closely with a few of these guys in the past and have absolute faith in their probity. They are extremely intelligent and do genuinely have the customer's best interests at heart. On the other hand, at least 2 of them (Richard Duvall and Sarah Matthews) were driving forces behind Egg's disastrous French market entry strategy...
- The ZOPA propositions (a) for borrowers I have been a ZOPA member for only a couple of days, but I have to say that even though I have a good credit rating, there doesn't seem to be much money in the 'A' market - only a grand available each day so far - and at terrible rates. I mean, as it happens I just borrowed 20k from Abbey to convert my loft. I got the money at 5.8%; the best rate on ZOPA is 8.6%. They're going to have to do a lot better than that !
It strikes me that ZOPA will attract a lot of stealth sub-prime business (i.e. people who have recently got themselves into difficulties but haven't yet damaged their credit ratings).
(b) for lenders Frankly, the lending proposition is a stinker. Here's why I think so:
Let's assume you have £1000 you're happy to tie up for 12 months. The best 12-month fixed rate I can find today on
formatting link
is 5.31% gross from the Bristol & West building society. This means you'll get £5.31 as a non-taxpayer, £42.48 if you pay tax at the basic rate and £31.86 at the highest rate of tax. At effectively no risk...
At ZOPA by contrast, you're going to have to price in the risk of a completely unknown book.
Let's assume that instead of putting your grand in the B&W you do decide to lend it out via ZOPA. They parcel it up into at least 50 loans, in this case of £20 each.
As I said above, I think they may be very attractive to the stealth sub-prime market, but let's be kind to ZOPA and assume that your bad debt rate is 2% (i.e. only 1 of the 50 people fails to pay back the money you lent them).
Let's further assume that ZOPA's debt recovery people are super cheap and efficient and get back half your value (by no means a given !).
So at the end of the day you'd be looking at a sundry loss of £10.
As a non-taxpayer, you now have to charge 6.31% to cover that risk; a basic-rate taxpayer needs to charge 6.56% and for the higher-rate taxpayer it rises to 6.98%. So right away, just to break even, you're uncompetitive to the commercial market.
Can't see why anyone but a sub-prime specialist would be brave enough to venture in...
Nick