Standard Life demutualisation

This is going to happen this year. Will it be best to hold on to the 'windfall' shares or sell them immediately?

MM

Reply to
MM
Loading thread data ...

Not necessarily. They'll need to get 75% of the members to vote, and half of them to say yes. Or something like that. Far from a foregone conclusion.

Define 'best'.

Reply to
Ronald Raygun

Most money. Some advisers might suggest keeping the shares indefinitely, others might say, best get shot of them pronto. A number of people I know have had their fingers burnt badly on the stock market. I myself only have the thirty-odd shares from Abbey National when it changed to a bank about ten (?) years ago. I have no experience of buying or owning shares apart from them.

MM

Reply to
MM

Not a good enough definition. Most money *when*?

Reply to
Ronald Raygun

Returns on the SL with profits fund have been extremely low over recent years. So another question might be: is it worth staying in the w/p fund even allowing for the potential windfall? In fact, I wonder if the whole demutualisation thing isn't just a ruse to prevent a mass exodus (that and the mva).

Fred

Reply to
Fred

In message , MM writes

Nobody has any idea yet. Wait until the prospectus is issued and the pundits can make a guess at the market value of the shares.

Reply to
john boyle

Well if we could predict the movements of the stock market then we wouldn't be hanging around here!

Your choices (Assuming that the floatation goes ahead.) are:

  1. Take the money and run.
  2. Hold the shares to sell later.

If you have no pressing need for cash (To pay off debts or reduce a mortgage) then you could hold the shares. As you also have Abbey shares your portfolio will be entirely in banking stocks. You might want to think about selling all your shares and putting the money in a shares ISA. That would get you some exposure to other sectors. If you're worried about investment risk then a cash ISA may be a better bet.

This advice is worth what you paid for it.

Reply to
Anthony Cunningham

In message , Anthony Cunningham writes

Except for the Standard Life shares, of course, as Standard Life isnt a bank.

Reply to
john boyle

So what is

formatting link
then?

Reply to
Ronald Raygun

Tch, your slipping here Ronald.

It is a small unquoted bank that, being a bank, is already incorporated and, therefore, can not demutualise and is not the subject of the demutualisation of The Standard Life Assurance Company.

All its shares are all held by The Standard Life Assurance Company.

Its shares are not available to the public and will not be available when its parent demutualises. The demutualisation is of the Assurance Company, not the Bank. The Life Assurance business is very very substantially larger than its banking subsidiary, which is a mere minnow.

The demutualised entity will be listed in the 'Insurance' sector not 'banking'.

Reply to
john boyle

Sigh, Financial Sector stocks then. The original point (That the holder of such a portfolio would be exposed to only one sector of the economy.) still stands.

Reply to
Anthony Cunningham

If you had excess cash in the bank, would you use it to buy Standard Life shares? Answer that, and you have an answer to your question............

Reply to
Matt Robertson

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.