VAT reduction.

So far I have not met a single person who believes that Darling's tinkering with the VAT rate will make a ha'porth of difference to the average person's spending habits - and yet, collectively, it's going to cost the country a fortune.

What a stupid, stupid, measure.

Ret.

Reply to
Ret.
Loading thread data ...

In message , Ret. writes

It seems that even Joe Public can see that this one is unlikely to work. Massive borrowing well in excess of what is being pumped in as we are already in a mess and he thinks we are in a position of relative strength. Talk about cloud Cuckoo land.

Reply to
Paul Harris

Yeah, but from the other threads, it might help business - not the smallest non-vat-paying ones, and certainly not the least well off.

Reply to
Tiddy Ogg

well it will make the shops another 2.5pc profit, ops wrong group of people

Reply to
Exhausted

In that case he should have increased VAT to 20%. Makes virtually no difference to spending habits, but will make the goverment £12bn instead. And makes VAT a lot easier to work out.

Reply to
Bartc

In message , Bartc writes

Not as daft as it sounds, and he could make it 50% on alcopops and fizzy lager if he likes.

Reply to
Gordon H

I found it intersting that he had the power to reduce VAT at all. I it was set by the EU.

Robert

Reply to
RobertL

# More like Alistair in Wonderland.

Reply to
brightside S9

The minimum is, which is coincidentially 15%.

I never quite understood why, though, as I would rather it was abolished and the loss made up from increased income tax.

Neil

Reply to
Neil Williams

EU countries have to pay VAT but each country gets to set its own rate. Most have Reduced and standard Rates and these can be found at

formatting link
The average standard rate is 19%, the highest is 25% (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden) and the lowest is 15% (Cyprus, Luxemberg and soon to be UK) so even before the reduction, VAT was still low compared to Europe as a whole.

Frankly, I do not believe this will increase spending to any great extent, and I doubt that traders will pass on the reduction as they will raise the basic price of the item to boost their profits.

If the Government really wants to encourage the public to spend, then he needs to set the maximum Interest rates that people must incur on Credit and Store Cards as even though the Bank of England Rate is at record lows, credit and store card rates are actually increasing.

Simon

I found it intersting that he had the power to reduce VAT at all. I it was set by the EU.

Robert

Reply to
Simon

Thats not a bad idea, fix two problems at once.

the drunk yobs and the slight lack of money....

Reply to
Exhausted

It's not designed to help Joe Public, it's designed to help businesses.

Not a single business will reduce their prices accordingly (see another thread about chinese takeaway prices, for example). So, by definition, their profit margin has just increased by £2.50 for every £100 worth of business they do.

The last thing the Government wants is another 750,000 unemployed all claiming shedload of benefits........the VAT cut will (the Chancellor hopes) stop that from happening.

Reply to
Craven Moorhead

Alcopops and lager are not the problem. Cheap wine is the beverage that needs to be taxed more highly.

Reply to
Alan

Amazing that I can buy 5 litres of cheapy wine in a plastic barrel in EastEnders Calais for under £4 and yet I don't have to clamber over gangs of marauding French teenagers to get back to my car.

Try another reason for badly behaved British teenagers.........

Reply to
Craven Moorhead

As indeed such rates should.

Because it went on so long, the correction will be painful - but it can't IMO be a bad thing for us to return to the days of saving for large purchases and spending within your means?

Neil

Reply to
Neil Williams

PC World already have reduced their prices accordingly.

I expect a lot of businesses will have to reduce their prices, either now or later as competitive pressures in a shrinking economy will force them to do so.

Reply to
Anthony Cunningham

Such a transition is not made any easier by the requirement to pay back the accumulated debt in addition to paying for 'now' and saving for the future.

Reply to
Graham Murray

Especially when the Government is doing the same, well they say that they will be in 2010 except that they will probably not be saving for the future based on their previous record but they will be expecting us to pay back their debt.

Reply to
Paul Harris

In message , Craven Moorhead writes

Badly behaved parents?

Reply to
Gordon H

Very good.

History will look back on this time and cite bad parenting as the cancer that killed socially acceptable behaviour.

Reply to
Craven Moorhead

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.