So far I have not met a single person who believes that Darling's tinkering with the VAT rate will make a ha'porth of difference to the average person's spending habits - and yet, collectively, it's going to cost the country a fortune.
What a stupid, stupid, measure.
Ret.
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
P
Paul Harris
In message , Ret. writes
It seems that even Joe Public can see that this one is unlikely to work. Massive borrowing well in excess of what is being pumped in as we are already in a mess and he thinks we are in a position of relative strength. Talk about cloud Cuckoo land.
T
Tiddy Ogg
Yeah, but from the other threads, it might help business - not the smallest non-vat-paying ones, and certainly not the least well off.
E
Exhausted
well it will make the shops another 2.5pc profit, ops wrong group of people
B
Bartc
In that case he should have increased VAT to 20%. Makes virtually no difference to spending habits, but will make the goverment £12bn instead. And makes VAT a lot easier to work out.
G
Gordon H
In message , Bartc writes
Not as daft as it sounds, and he could make it 50% on alcopops and fizzy lager if he likes.
R
RobertL
I found it intersting that he had the power to reduce VAT at all. I it was set by the EU.
Robert
B
brightside S9
# More like Alistair in Wonderland.
N
Neil Williams
The minimum is, which is coincidentially 15%.
I never quite understood why, though, as I would rather it was abolished and the loss made up from increased income tax.
Neil
S
Simon
EU countries have to pay VAT but each country gets to set its own rate. Most have Reduced and standard Rates and these can be found at
formatting link
The average standard rate is 19%, the highest is 25% (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden) and the lowest is 15% (Cyprus, Luxemberg and soon to be UK) so even before the reduction, VAT was still low compared to Europe as a whole.
Frankly, I do not believe this will increase spending to any great extent, and I doubt that traders will pass on the reduction as they will raise the basic price of the item to boost their profits.
If the Government really wants to encourage the public to spend, then he needs to set the maximum Interest rates that people must incur on Credit and Store Cards as even though the Bank of England Rate is at record lows, credit and store card rates are actually increasing.
Simon
I found it intersting that he had the power to reduce VAT at all. I it was set by the EU.
Robert
E
Exhausted
Thats not a bad idea, fix two problems at once.
the drunk yobs and the slight lack of money....
C
Craven Moorhead
It's not designed to help Joe Public, it's designed to help businesses.
Not a single business will reduce their prices accordingly (see another thread about chinese takeaway prices, for example). So, by definition, their profit margin has just increased by £2.50 for every £100 worth of business they do.
The last thing the Government wants is another 750,000 unemployed all claiming shedload of benefits........the VAT cut will (the Chancellor hopes) stop that from happening.
A
Alan
Alcopops and lager are not the problem. Cheap wine is the beverage that needs to be taxed more highly.
C
Craven Moorhead
Amazing that I can buy 5 litres of cheapy wine in a plastic barrel in EastEnders Calais for under £4 and yet I don't have to clamber over gangs of marauding French teenagers to get back to my car.
Try another reason for badly behaved British teenagers.........
N
Neil Williams
As indeed such rates should.
Because it went on so long, the correction will be painful - but it can't IMO be a bad thing for us to return to the days of saving for large purchases and spending within your means?
Neil
A
Anthony Cunningham
PC World already have reduced their prices accordingly.
I expect a lot of businesses will have to reduce their prices, either now or later as competitive pressures in a shrinking economy will force them to do so.
G
Graham Murray
Such a transition is not made any easier by the requirement to pay back the accumulated debt in addition to paying for 'now' and saving for the future.
P
Paul Harris
Especially when the Government is doing the same, well they say that they will be in 2010 except that they will probably not be saving for the future based on their previous record but they will be expecting us to pay back their debt.
G
Gordon H
In message , Craven Moorhead writes
Badly behaved parents?
C
Craven Moorhead
Very good.
History will look back on this time and cite bad parenting as the cancer that killed socially acceptable behaviour.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.