Consolidation/Advanced Accounting problem...

Note: I'm a beginner at advanced accounting, and I made this problem up. I'm not asking for help on "homework." I'm looking simply to understand the principle that this advanced accounting textbook is not that great at explaining. Because consolidations can be complex, I set this problem up by going through everything I understand first in an example problem and then asking my main question way down at the end. For those who don't want to read through my example but might be good at explaining the answer the my question... Why, for consolidation purposes, is retained earnings of the seller decreased in the year following a transer from Company A down to Company B, assuming the goods are sold in the following year... I know all about why COGS sold should be decreased, since Beg Inv is overstated since Ending Inventory was overstated in the first year... anyway, here's what I understand up until that point using a concrete example...

Year 1: Assume company A buys goods for $40,000 and sells them to company B for $100,000, and assume also that company A owns 100% of company B. Assume that at the end of the year, Company B, of the $100,000 it buys, has sold $70,000.

Ok, this causes the following Company A journal entries.

A COMPANY

----------------------------------------

  1. Debit: Purchase ,000

Credit: Cash $40,000

Self-explanatory.

--------------------------------------------

  1. Debit: Cash 0,000

Credit: Sales $100,000

This is the entry that results from sales to Company B.

--------------------------------------

  1. Debit: COGS ,000

Credit: Purchase $40,000

This entry occurs because Company A has sold all of the $40,000 of goods to Company B, thus none of the $40,000 ends up in ending inventory. Remember, the cost of Purchases and Beginning Inventory can only end up in one of either TWO places: Ending Inventory or COGS: End Inv + COGS = Purchases + Beg Inv.

----------------------------------

Company B entries

--------------------------------------

  1. Debit: Purchase 0,000

Credit: Cash $100,000

Self-explanatory

-------------------------------------------------

  1. Debit: COGS 0,000

Credit: Purchase $100,000

Even though this entry could be combined with the entry below, it doesn't have to be and for understanding consolidation worksheet entries, it's best for me not to combine the two entries. That is, I simply dump all of the purchases into COGS with this entry and then adjust for what goes into ending inventory with the entry below. This COGS figure will be taken out in the consolidation worksheet entries.

---------------------------------------

  1. Debit: End Inv ,000

Credit: COGS $30,000

As I said in the question, Company B, of the $100,000, sold $70,000 of the goods. Thus, $30,000 remains from this $100,000 in Ending Inventory, so, since everything else is held constant, it must come from COGS. So we increase Ending Inventory and decrease COGS by what's left.

----------------------

Consolidated Worksheet entries for year 1.

--------------------------------------------

  1. Debit: Sales 0,000

Credit: COGS $100,000

There is exactly one place in the above journal entries where I have a credit for sales of $100,000 (entry 2). There is also exactly one place in the above journal entries where I have COGS for $100,000 (entry 5). Take both of them out, and you are still in balance and on your way to having things the way they should be when the companies are viewed as a consolidation.

------------------------------

Debit: End Inv $18,000

Credit: COGS $18,000

This was a tricky entry for me to understand. The KEY to understanding this entry is to look first at entry 3. Obviously, as you look at entry 3, you realize that, for consolidation purposes, there needs to be an adjustment, because not ALL of the goods have left the combined company, having been sold to outsiders, yet. That is, entry 3 has ALL of the goods as going into COGS with no ending inventory adjustment. There must be an ending inventory adjustment for consolidation purposes if there are still some goods in the combined company. What is the exact adjustment needed? It would be the percentage of goods left multipiplied by the original COGS. $30,000/$100,000 or 3/10 goods are left, so 3/10($40,000 original cost) $12,000 is what is left. So, we need a debit to ending inventory of $12,000 and a credit to COGS of $12,000. Well, Company B in entry 6 helps us out for consolidation purposes by adding Ending Inventory of $30,000 and lessening COGS by $30,000. However, this is too much of an adjustment. Thus, have to change this adjustment to equal an adjustment of $12,000. We do this by the consolidation debit of $18,000 to ending inventory and a credit to COGS of $18,000.

----------------------------------------------------------------

OK, in the following year, Beginning Inventory for company B is going to be overstated by $18,000. Assuming all of this goes to COGS, this means COGS will be overstated and will need to be adjusted downward by $18,000. However, my book is telling me the corresponding entry to this problem is a Debit to the Retained earnings of the "seller," which I assume they mean in my case Company A. WHYYYY?

Reply to
xyzer
Loading thread data ...

I should say Company B, when looked upon from a consolidated point of view, along with company A, has overstated Beg Inv of $18,000.

Or maybe I'm just confusing myself further!

grr

Reply to
xyzer

Since Company A owns 100% of company B, then yes the inventory adjustment would need to be flushed through company A's retained earnings. The reason being, that Company B, as a stand alone entity doe not need adjustsments. Usually concolidation entries are only memo journals, and are not booked to the actual company records, they are recorded to correcty state upstream / dowstream / and other related party transactions.

Again since Company owns 100% of company B, effectively the financial of Company A should correctly state conslidated position of the coneolidated entity using an investment in company B account, and the equity method of accounting.

Also, keep in mind that when adjusting opening year balances to match prior year consolidated ending balances, any income statement adjustemnts from prior years to correclty state any balance sheet accounts, in your case inventory, need to be pushed through retianed earnings, as that is whre all prior year icomet statment activity is dumped. You can't contaminate current year earingins with prior yea r adjsutments. The concolidation entries again are just memo entries for the consoliaditon worksheet. An adjustemt to reatined earnings is simply an adjsutment to consolidated retained earnings, and not simply company A retained earnings.

Hope this helps.

A CPA in NYS.

Reply to
Adrian Morales

One thing to keep in mind, regardless of seller/buyer is that COGS is closed out at year end -- it's not a permanent account. So, if you have adjustments which need to be made the following year, how are you going to adjust a closed acount? You're not. The only way to make this adjustment, then, is through Retained Earnings. Adrian Morales gave a good thorough explanation, so I just thought I'd toss this in for additional consideration, in the hopes that it might help make other consolitation issues clearer, as they are added on.

I just wrapped up Advanced this past Spring, and we covered consolidations for most of the semester. Fun stuff :)

Also remember that Company A wholly owns Company B, so when it comes time for the consolidated statements, you'll need to switch into "intracompany sales" mode of thinking, since A sold to B (downstream).

Hope this helps some!

-Holly

Reply to
Holly J. Sommer

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.