I am still using Quicken 2000 Deluxe because it does everything that I need and I haven't found a good reason to update, yet. Many people on this board say that they never start a new year and just allow ther data file to grow, but I want to start a new year and archive some older years because the current file takes too long to backup and I'm concerned about crashing and losing six years of data.
My problem is with the "copy" function of the program. When using "archive" or "copy" (I have tried both), a status screen pops up showing a blue progress bar. Suposedly, when copying is complete a message should show "copy sucessfully completed". In my case the blue progress bar stops half way across every time and the program freezes. I do not get an error message.
I have to do ALT-CTRL-DEL to end the program. After I reopen the program I find that a copy was actually made but three large accounts are not being copied. These accounts are reconciled and don't contain any uncleared entries so they should copy. I have validated the file which finds no errors but the the copy function still freezes the program and these accounts still don't copy.
I have tried everthing that I can think of --- breaking out different years, etc.--- but nothing works, so perhaps there is some damage to the data that validate does not find and repair, or another problem that causes the program to freeze and not copy the accounts.
I can, however, make a New Year file which contains all data for the years that I want to include - 2004 to present. I just can't make a valid archive copy of the years 2000 though 2003 with those three accounts in it.
So, I am thinking of just starting the New Year file and leaving the entire current file intact as a seperate file. The current file would in effect be my "archive" file. Since the two files will have have different names I think that this should work.
I don't think that it's necessary to actually have a true archive file, is it? Can't I just start a new year and leave the current file there and never use it again? Does this make sense to anyone and do you see any problems with doing it this way? Thanks for any input that anyone can offer.