Can a sale of private stock with a fixed amount held back in escrow for 1 year and made "available to the buyer in certain situations to cover indemnification claims" be reported using "open transaction" method?

Background. I owned series A and series B preferred stock in a private company that merged with a public company in 2015 giving rise to large gains.The merger closing date occurred in September 2015 at which time cash proceeds were paid out shortly thereafter but 10% of the sales consideration was placed in escrow for one year and "available to the buyer in certain situations to cover indemnification claims". The quote appears to define this escrow as having imposed "substantial restrictions" on seller's right to receive escrow payment one year later. Ultimately, the escrow was paid in full to the selling shareholders one year later. I later learned that this merger agreement ("MA") stated that the escrow payouts "distributions of cash out of the Escrow Fund should be eligible for installment sale reporting". The MA then proceeds to describe the mechanics of the installment method. The 1099 received in '15 only included proceeds received in such year (i.e. not the escrow amount) and I reported these proceeds net of the full cost basis of the securities on the 2015 return with the intent to report the escrow payments received in '16, if any, as gain (with no basis left to offset) on the '16 return. Am I right to assume that this sale is not eligible for the "open transaction" method (as I reported on the '15 return) and I now must amend the '15 return using the installment sales method?

Reply to
Riotubes
Loading thread data ...

replying to Riotubes, Riotubes wrote: After much research the answer is that, given the above situation, one must amend the return by filing a 1040X and recompute the gains using the installment sales method because taxpayer did not correctly elect out of the installment sale method on the tax return that coincided with the year in which the merger occurred. The transaction is subject to the installment sale method because the way in which the escrow was structured (i.e. made available to the buyer to cover indemnification claims" which satisfies the "substantial restriction" criterion.

Reply to
Riotubes

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.