Questions about Shared Custody Agreement

Circle false on that. I don't plan on spending any money on lawyers for the foreseeable future, and hopefully my daughter won't either.

--

Reply to
Rick
Loading thread data ...

This reply is based on the original post and subsequent replies thru Stuart B's 4th response.

Congress explicitly changed the rules regarding who gets to claim a child when you have divorced, separated or never married parents in order to get out of having to make family court decisions. Since changing the law, the rules are hard wired (IRC Sec. 152(e)) and every tax court decision has conformed to those rules.

To be a qualifying child, you must first answer two questions: was the child in physical custody of both parents for more than half the year and did the parents provide more than half of the child's total support. If yes, the exemption goes to the parent who had physical custody for the most number of nights. That parent is treated as the custodial parent for tax purposes. The divorce decree or separation agreement has no bearing on this. All of the benefits attributable to having a qualifying child go to the custodial parent. The only way the non-custodial parent can claim the dependency exemption (since 2018 the exemption deduction is zero)) and obtain the $2000 child tax credit (I believe the child was one year old) is if the custodial parent provides Form 8332 (but see below) to the non-custodial parent. The non-custodial parent would now claim the child as a dependent and also claim the child tax credit. The custodial parent still has available any other tax benefit that goes with having a qualifying child living with that parent (assumes any relevant test is passed). E.g., the custodial parent could file as HOH; claim the earned income tax credit; claim the child and dependent care credit, etc.

Once the child reached age 17, the non-custodial parent could claim the $500 Other Dependent Credit.

In those situations where the custodial parent has refused to sign the

8332 in violation of the contents of the divorce or separation agreement, the IRS has stood firm that the exemption stays with the custodial parent.

Relative to Form 8332, the courts have accepted substitute documents as long as the document provided the same information required by Form 8332 and was signed and dated by the custodial parent. The most important element of the declaration is that the custodial parent will not claim the child as a dependent and it identifies the year or years.

The wording in the divorce/separation agreement that says who may claim the child in any given year fails this test! The IRS and the courts require an affirmative signed statement from the custodial parent that the exemption will NOT be claimed.

Reply to
Alan

"Rick" snipped-for-privacy@nospam.com wrote in news:r4b9lj$hsq$ snipped-for-privacy@gioia.aioe.org:

The rules with the 8332 are that the facts are largely irrelevant as long as the parents agree on who gets to claim the child in any particular year. As a practical matter if they do what they contemplated so that they alternate and neither one gets greedy and tries to get what they're not entitled to, the formality of signing the 8332 isn't strictly necessary because they are unlikely ever to be asked for it. But if either tries to get something they're not entitled to, and they file conflicting tax returns, that's when trouble will start.

Reply to
Stuart O. Bronstein

I would not have categorized the facts as being irrelevant. They are very relevant as that is the law.

That said, I have never heard or seen a situation where the IRS audited someone who filed as HOH with a qualifying child and claimed all the tax benefits that went with that as long as no one else filed a tax return with the child's SS# on the return.

I can not make the same statement for the great state of CA.

Reply to
Alan

Alan, I have to admit that your characterization is more legally precise than mine. The reason I said "irrelevant" is that the instructions for Form 8332 say, among other things, that the form can be used to,

"Release a claim to exemption for your child so that the noncustodial parent can claim an exemption for the child and claim the child tax credit, the additional child tax credit, and the credit for other dependents (if applicable)."

To me that sounds like the 8332 makes the actual situation largely irrelevant, since the spouse that otherwise wouldn't be able to qualify for the exemption, can qualify if the 8332 is executed.

Reply to
Stuart O. Bronstein

I thought the issue here was that the HOH couldn't be transferred by the form. So even if the 8332 is passed back and forth between the parties according to whose "year" it is (even or odd) to control benefits, the HOH would always stay with the parent who had >50% custody.

--

Reply to
Rick

That is correct. The 8832 only deals with the dependency exemption. As the exemption deduction is now zero, the value of the dependency is the child tax credit (CTC), the additional child tax credit (ACTC), and the ODC if not eligible for the CTC/ACTC. All other tax benefits stay with the custodial parent.

Reply to
Alan

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.