Separation Agreement

A husband and wife have a separation agreement under which he is making monthly payments to her. I understand that such payments are treated as alimony - deductible by the payer, taxable to the payee. The husband has now violated some provision of the agreement and her lawyer is claiming that the entire agreement is now vacated and all payments revert to voluntary status, neither deductible nor taxable.

Correct? If some non-monetary provision is ignored, but the monthly checks keep coming, are they still treated as alimony - even if the agreement is declared invalid? (This matter is before a judge, so the question may eventually become moot.)

Reply to
R. Pile
Loading thread data ...

It looks to me like the ongoing validity of his obligation under the agreement is the key. Tax law (IRC 71) doesn't require anything other than payment "under a divorce or separation instrument."

State law is going to decide whether he's liable for the payments or not. Based on my cursory reading of the statute and general cussedness, since she's (through counsel) saying further payments are voluntary, I'd stop the payments until the court settled things. I do not recommend that course to him, though. He should talk to his lawyer, who should check up on both the family and tax law sides of the question.

Sure hope there are no children caught in the middle of these two.

Reply to
Phil Marti

This is a legal question and I am not a lawyer. But it seems that the other lawyer claims that because some part of the agreement is violated, then supposedly the monthly payment has somehow become "voluntary". If this is indeed correct, then prior to this alleged violation the payments were still alimony. So depending on the date of said violation, any prior payments would still be alimony. And as the other poster said, if it's voluntary than there is nothing to compel payment of any kind.

Reply to
PeterL

And her lawyer, being a lawyer, might be trying to get the husband to stop payment so that can be waived in front of the judge or jury as proof of how evil the husband is.

He should consult with his attorney ASAP as already mentioned.

Reply to
Paul Thomas, CPA

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.