Browns tax grab now even larger than Germany's

Jan 15, 2006 11 Replies

Browns tax and spend policy is diminishing Britains economic performance.



"higher taxes will lead to an inevitable collapse in Britain's economic performance, a rise in unemployment and a decline in foreign direct investment."............


UK tax grab now even larger than Germany's



By : Allister Heath January 15, 2006



formatting link
BRITAIN'S tax burden will surge ahead of Germany's for the first time in a generation this year. It signals the end of an era for the UK as it decisively turns its back on economic liberalism, a report reveals this weekend.



The news, which confirms that Chancellor Gordon Brown has Europeanised the British economy by stealth through a massive programme of extra public spending and higher taxes, was condemned by top City of London economists this weekend. They said higher taxes will lead to an inevitable collapse in Britain's economic performance, a rise in unemployment and a decline in foreign direct investment.



The UK fiscal burden - mainly taxes but also fees and other government income - will hit 42.4% of gross domestic product (GDP) this year, according to an analysis of Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development figures published this weekend by Bank of America. By contrast, the fiscal burden in Germany will fall to 42.1% of GDP, less than Britain's for the first time in recent history. Britain will also outspend Germany from next year, the OECD figures also show. In 2007, German government expenditure will fall to 45% of GDP, while British public spending will hit a new high of 45.7% of GDP.


Holger Schmieding, an economist at Bank of America, said: "Anybody who believes that Germany is a high-tax, big government country and that Britain is lean and low-tax may want to look at the figures. The great convergence between Britain and the Continent has been a major theme. As Britain squanders some of its post-Thatcher advantage and the Continent embraces some reforms, the two sides of the Channel are becoming much more similar again."



The extent of the transformation of Britain's economy has been dramatic, Bank of America says. As recently as 1999, German taxpayers were saddled with a 46.4% of GDP tax burden, against 40.4% for Britain, a six-point gap that has now vanished. Public spending has exploded in the UK from 37.5% of GDP in 2000 to 45.4% this year, according to the OECD figures, which unlike those from the UK Treasury are internationally comparable.



David Smith, chief economist at Williams de Broë, said: "These new figures show that Brown has resocialised the British economy and squandered the Thatcher legacy. The British political class must answer a simple question: why should Britain's growth rate and structural rate of employment continue to be higher than that the pathetic rate of Germany or Italy now that we are adopting their tax and spending levels?"



Smith added that the transformation of the UK economy into a Continental-style social democracy and the absence of any real alternative from an increasingly left-wing Conservative Party would frighten away foreign investors at a time when they are desperately needed to pay for Britain's surging current account deficit. Smith said: "It is hard to see why any foreign investor would want to touch the UK economy with a barge pole."



Britain's long-term, trend rate of growth will collapse form



2.5%-2.75% to 2.25% a year or slightly less, close to the euro zone's
2% rate, according to Bank of America. Schmieding said: "The great fiscal convergence is likely to leave its traces in the growth statistics over time."

Brown's public sector recruitment binge has crowded out private sector job creation, according to fresh research from think-tank Reform. UK regions with the largest percentage growth in public sector employment experienced the lowest percentage growth in private sector employment. The surge in state workers has also coincided with a dramatic slowdown in the growth of private sector jobs nationally.



Between 1994 and 1999, public sector employment fell by an average of



45,000 a year, the research shows. If this rate had continued after
1999, there would have been a decrease of 270,000 public sector jobs between 1999 and 2005. In actual fact, public sector employment rose by
637,000 from 1999 to 2005.

Between 1994 and 1999, private sector employment rose by an average of



362,000 a year. If this rate had continued after 1999, there would have been an increase of 2,172,000 private sector jobs by 2005. In fact, only 955,000 new private sector jobs were created.

Corin Taylor, economic research officer at Reform, said: "The huge rises in public sector employment have caused a massive transfer of resources away from the productive private sector, hitting economic growth and productivity."



A GfK survey of 500 business leaders for the Institute of Directors on Monday will reveal that UK business confidence is flat. The survey shows there has been no significant change in optimism, performance, profitability, capacity utilisation and investment intentions over the past three months.



City economists believe there is only a 25% chance of a rate cut in February 2005, according to a poll of analysts by Ideaglobal. The consensus is that the next rate reduction will be in May, when rates would drop by 0.25 points from their current level of 4.5%.



Brown is the best chancellor in decades, if not ever, and needs to take no lessons from centre-right 'think tanks' like Reform.

you appear to have missed the smiley off the end.

tim

He was at his best when he followed his own fiscal rules, and those laid down by Lamont (yes i know).

Do you believe that 'unemployment is a price worth paying for low inflation'?

Gaz

In message , "Mark, Devon" writes

Are you a troll or a deluded fool?

Clark and Brown where much better at following them, and a lot luckier, Lamont was the man who stuck to his guns when the s*it was hitting the wall, for events outside his control.

Would Brown have the bottle to run a high interest rate policy to keep inflation down????

Lamont contributed to killing inflation, the British Disease.

Gaz

He is only second to Anthony Barber, you have to give them both a lot of credit, they certainly landed this country with a lot of credit!

Um, well I find it very hard to think anything good of him. I only remember Lamont running a high interest rate policy to keep the pound in the ERM. After black Wednesday rates came down quickly. I would have thought the reason for this was the strength of the UK economy due to lower taxation than Europe and less regulation.

Ridiculously increased regulation and taxation are the bomb shell legacy that Brown has left us. A legacy which I believe will prove even more damaging that Blair's costly war mongering.

The pensions mess is incredible, it as if we had a Robert Maxwell style swindle of pension funds.

Former Labour MP, Robert Maxwell plundered 400 million from Mirror pensions fund. The amount Gordon Brown has plundered in *extra* tax is that equivalent every month since Labour has taken power.

We have vast amounts of people in the middle classes who now have little or no pension to look forward. The only people who are likely to retire comfortably are public sector employees.

Gaz

Yep I worked for Maxwell Communications. Never worried about a pension though.

Are you talking about the Tax on Dividends? It wasn't entirely his fault, during the dot com boom a lot of companies failed to finance their schemes properly.

If you let someone control your money they always seem to rip you off. Its best finance your old age another way.

By their own admission the government inherited a first class set of books and spending plans from the previous Chancellor, which they did nothing to alter and religiously adhered to for two years with enormous success.

Brown also had a 27 billion windfall from the sell off of mobile phone frequencies, with the addition of 66 stealth taxes and the forage into pension funds.

Most of it spent on a huge increase in public service employees and massively increased public expenditure, not forgetting that our good fortune from the North Sea has nearly all being squandered, so not only will we lose the revenue which that generates, but in the not-too-distant future we will have to find the extra billions to pay for imported fuel.

When a government starts talking about taxing people on the views from their windows, then it tells me just how desperate things have become.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required