Funding for retirement in 20 years?

Hi.

I saw some of tonight's ITV prog about disappearing pensions, which seemed pretty doom and gloom and has made me wonder what alternatives there are.

Take the following situation:

You are in a final salary company pension scheme (which of course has a large deficit) and realistically you can't be sure you will work there until you retire or that the scheme will not close at some point. You want to retire in 20 or so years time and you can currently make some additional money available to invest.

The options seem to be to pay additional contributions into the company scheme; to set up some sort of additional personal pension (stakeholder?); or to invest in a non pension fashion. For the last option, let's think positive and assume 10,000 or 20,000 to be put away now to provide income (or just a big lump of cash) to live off of in 20 years time. Obviously seeking to avoid as much tax as possible etc. and nothing too risky that would mean not being able to afford to retire!

Has anyone got any suggestions please?

Reply to
Hammer Head
Loading thread data ...

Pensions, ISA's VCTs

Unfortunately risk tends to be inversly proprtional to gain.

Take lots of little different risks - 20 years is plenty for some of them to come through.

I think one realistically needs to know your current tax rate and tax rate over the next 20 years, your likely income (and therefore top tax rate) in retirement. Your marital / children and therefore inheritance needs now - or how they might change over the next 20 years and lots of other things before one can make proper suggestions.

Reply to
Miss L. Toe

Bitstring , from the wonderful person Hammer Head said

Yep, you need to think bigger. Look £10-20k will just about buy a decent new car, right? Over 20 years, if you keep ahead of inflation by 4%/year (very tough to do without taking significant risks) you'll about double it. That's not going to keep you into old age very far (two cars worth!).

You need to be thinking more along the lines of sticking in 15-20% of your gross salary into something, every year for 20 years, and hoping you can then take out 30-40% of your final gross salary for the 20 years after that. Depends what you need to live on of course, but £20k wouldn't get me and the wife very far at all.

Reply to
GSV Three Minds in a Can

Give up on pensions.

The pensions industry are crooks who take your money and do a bad job and pay too much to themselves.

Invest in property.

Reply to
Peter Saxton

But bear in mind that property prices are exceptionally high at the moment, perhaps because everyone in the country seems to think like Mr Saxton.

Reply to
GB

So Invest in Indian Property ?

Reply to
Miss L. Toe

At least if you lose out you only have yourself to blame and not a bunch of crooks.

Reply to
Peter Saxton

It was damning. I wonder how Cos ever got away with taking 'payment holidays'..?

They behaved like Maxwell, but apparently it was all legal.

And how on earth did nobody see it coming...?

Wow...don't even think of it...!

Remember your contributions are likely to pay for existing pensions, not your own. If the scheme is already and deficit and now closed to new members there maybe nobody left to pay the pensions of the youngest people remaining in the scheme as those already retired refuse to die on cue and drain the scheme of its reserves.

Cash ISAs, Bulgarian and Eygptian property.

Reply to
whitely525

In message , Peter Saxton writes

What? And deal with Estate Agents? They are just crooks who take your money and do a bad job and pay too much to themselves.

Reply to
John Boyle

You don't need to deal with estate agents to invest in property.

Reply to
Ronald Raygun

Well, the pension protection fund should cover things now -

With that amount of money you'll be looking at a real increase of between around 2.5 to 3.9 times the original sum if you invest directly in shares. If you pay someone to do it for you, then you're looking at 2 to 3.2 times at a charge of 1%pa .i.e (18 - 20% less) [1]. Cash would be the most risky investment over that period and therefore I've ignored it.

In a pension you could take 25% tax free and then income of ~7.2%. -

On £20,000 that's -

25% Income £19,500 £4,212 £10,000 £2,160

and half that for a £10,000 starting sum.

The governments minimum income guarantee (MIG) which you would get your income made up to would be around £9,077 - £11,451 making such an investment pointless. You'd need to find some investment vehicle that wasn't taken into account by the benefits people such as collectibles or antiques, and you'd need to know what you were doing. Perhaps you could make some genuinely value enhancing addition to your property or move, although there's a high (~2%) cost to the latter.

Daytona

[1] Barclays Capital Equity Gilt Study -

106 Years -

Inflation 3.9% Equity Capital Growth 4.6% Equity Income Growth 3.8%

Total Real Growth 4.5%

1990 - 2005 low inflation period -

Inflation 2.7% Equity Capital Growth 7.0% Equity Income Growth 2.7%

Total Real Growth 7.0%

Reply to
Daytona

ISBN 0836217578

Err, and ISAs

HTH, Alan

Reply to
Alan Frame

If you want to deal with estate agents then go ahead. Even if you do you are in a position of influence completely different to handing the money over and letting an incompetent waste it.

I'm expecting to getting sufficient income from property in my old age. My wife's daughter is 24 and already has a BTL and deals with it herself - but she is an estate agent!

Reply to
Peter Saxton

No - You'd blame the Estate Agents :-)

Reply to
Miss L. Toe

Considering he has a final salary pension scheme plus presumably the state pension, I guess his other income would take him well above 11.5K.

Reply to
Andy Pandy

Sorry, I'm nonsensically comparing inflated Pensions Credit (was MIG) with real investment returns. PC is £5,931pa single, £9,051pa couples.

Can't make any more out of it even if we wanted to without, as you say, the other sources of income.

Daytona

Reply to
Daytona

"Peter Saxton" wrote

Ah, but if "you only have yourself to blame", then you have

*no-one* else to go after for compensation. But if you can blame "a bunch of crooks", then you can go after *them* for compensation. And even if *they* can't pay out, then you can go to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme / Pension Protection Fund etc (depending on type of pension).

So why do you think it is better to "only have yourself to blame and not a bunch of crooks"?

Reply to
Tim

wrote

For the most part, they *had* to -- in order to keep all their tax benefits. [If their funding level went over 105%, they began losing the tax benefits...]

Reply to
Tim

"news" wrote

Isn't that 1.5%, when applied to *all* the house sales across the country during the year, actually VERY similar to the 9 Billion total you quoted above?

Reply to
Tim

Does she do her own accounts?

Reply to
Ronald Raygun

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.