Insufficient profit from selling property to pay off secured load...

Nov 02, 2005 26 Replies

In message , snipped-for-privacy@mailinator.com writes

When taking security lenders do so for more reasons than just making sure that the value of the house less the amount outstanding to the prior mortgagee. One major reason for taking a second charge over the domestic property is to put more pressure on the debtor to fulfil their liabilities. Debtors tend to ensure that any payments on loans for which their house is used as security take precedence over other debts. Sometimes a second mortgagee will take that position even with hardly any equity available and in these circumstances the security is said to be taken on a 'for what worth' basis.

So, this means that the amount of equity that was available to the second mortgagee isnt as important as you may think, they have still got you by the short & curlies in any event.

In message , Tim writes

I was really pre-empting an obvious reply to the previous part of the sentence, and was talking about those who had truly given up caring, and would who probably disappear into the ether without paying.

In message , Ronald Raygun writes

Yes Minister

In message , snipped-for-privacy@mailinator.com writes

Maybe they would consider taking a charge on the next property, provided it happens simultaneously.

"Ronald Raygun" wrote

Tee hee - bike precariously balanced on the fence, and with very long ears to reach the ground?

I did like the spoof story on last week's

formatting link
"Credit Crisis: Britons are now borrowing more money than they are spending!"

An old one, but still funny:

formatting link
rgds, Alan

I received an offer on my flat so I spoke with the lender and they said I can sell. They'll take as much as they can from the equity and I can carry on repayments as normal.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required