My spell checker's in for a service.
No you didn't. You compared a high interest rate/high inflation scenario with a low interest rate/low inflation scenario. If both interest rates and inflation had gone down, it would be a relevant question. But that's not the case, so it isn't.
"Andy Pandy" wrote
You shouldn't need a spell checker for such a simple word!
"Andy Pandy" wrote
Oh yes I did!! [Try reading it again.]
"Andy Pandy" wrote
Yes, I know. Perhaps you *can* read, after all!!
"Andy Pandy" wrote
Erm, can you tell us just where inflation is mentioned in your quote? Answer: it isn't.
The quote only mentions low interest ("times when interest rates are low"). So my question *is* relevant against the post to which I replied.
If you don't know the answer to my question, why don't you just say so?
It's mentioned in your question.
Yawn...I'd almost forgotton what a tedious little man you are...Ta ta!
"Andy Pandy" wrote
Yes I know - I wrote it! So are you seriously trying to suggest that if a question mentions anything extra that wasn't in the OP, then that makes the question irrelevant?
If so, then your question "But that's not the case, is it?" is irrelevant to the previous posts, which didn't mention the current 'case' at all...
Or do you think that anything that isn't related to "current times", is always irrelevant?
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required