Overzealous Enforcement of Data Protection Act?!

Alright, overwhelmingly I'm for the Data Protection Act, but today I reckon it actually cost me money!

I wanted to pay an overpayment on my mortgage. I had forgotten to bring with me my mortgage account number, but even so, I thought I would still be able to pay the money in and that would be that after a quick verfication of my name, address and whatever else they asked me for (except ID, which unfortunately I didn't have with me!).

Anyway, they said they couldn't accept my payment because of the Data Protection Act. I said I don't want to know anything about the mortgage account, I just want you to take my money and pay it in, nothing else. But they refused! How silly!

I could understand it if I asked for a mortgage statement, or even possibly a receipt, but I just wanted them to take the money and pay it in. What's the difference if I were to pay money into someone else's standard bank account (ie walking in, filling in a deposit slip for another person's account?) - they accept that, so why not this?!

Thus I reckon the Data Protection Act can be a little bizarre...

Reply to
<nospam
Loading thread data ...

The Act is probably fine - just the interpretation by the institution concerned.

Reply to
Wireless Reader

The Act is probably fine - just the interpretation by the institution concerned.

Reply to
Wireless Reader

I wonder what they would have told you if you asked where in the Data Protection Act it prohibits them from accepting your payment. As the Data Protection Act is often used as an excuse, it might be interesting to carry a copy of the act with you and when the act is 'blamed' for a company not being able to do something, bring out the act and ask the person telling you this to show you the specific part of the act which prevents them from doing what you ask.

Reply to
Graham Murray

The OP is asking a financial institution to confirm, by accepting the money, that X has a mortgage with them.

Well that's what Union Bank Of Switzerland said to me when they refused to accept money into an account in Switzerland. It was used by the Nazi's in the 1930 to confirm that certain people had accounts outside of Germany and then cart them off to the camps.

Mark BR

Reply to
Mark BR

I find that it is an excellent excuse not to give information to cold calling sales people.

"Who supplies your electricity at the moment"

"Due to the data protection act we are unfortunately unable to discuss this with third parties"

"OK sorry to have bothered you"

Reply to
Adrian Boliston

If it is clear that you are paying into someone elses bank account then you can be contacted (as well as the recipient) and asked to verify the purpose of the transaction. But suppose someone claiming to be you puts money into your account and then contacts the Inland Revenue or Benefits Agency, and "reports" that you have "undeclared income", or are "working on the side". Then you have some explaining to do. Sounds absurd that someone should want to put money into your account rather than drain it, but some people do bear grudges and will do almost anything to "get even", as they see it. (As many divorcees know from bitter experience).

Ellis

Reply to
Ellis

Reply to
rob.

Well, then that's a good enough reason for me. Fair enough.

Thanks for the info.

Reply to
<nospam

Organisations use it as an excuse when they can't be bothered to do something for you (like work out your mortgage account number)

Reply to
me

My wife had her wallet stolen overseas. The bank wouldn't stop her credit cards on my say. Partially understand this but they were nonetheless unhelpful. She then ran out of credits on her PAYG. Orange wouldn't let me top up neither would they phone her to arrange a top up.

Lots of other examples from banks where I administer accounts on behalf of various societies. All "jobsworth" responses. Commonsense has gone out of the window and it is no longer possible to talk to anyone in authority or with someone who actually knows you.

Reply to
AnthonyL

"rob." wrote

In that case, you should have refused to leave the counter until the teller had finished your transaction - ie, fill in the slip **at the counter** !

Reply to
Tim

I prefer the "none of your f****** business" approach to those sorts of calls.

Reply to
Jonathan Bryce

I just ask for their home phone number so I can call them back at an inconvenient time.

Reply to
John Redman

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.