Fraudsters Stealing Some TurboTax Refunds After Customers Filed

In a tax season plagued with identify theft and tax fraud, a new method of online criminal activity has been identified, according to Intuit?s statements to The Washington Post. Typically, fraudsters file a tax return in their victims? names to collect the refund. In February, a rash of taxpayers reported logging into TurboTax to discover their state return already processed, leading Intuit to temporarily halt TurboTax e-filing. Earlier this month, Intuit CEO Brad Smith joined other tax software leaders in a sit-down with the Internal Revenue Service to address the growing problem. In this rarer form of theft, tax refunds are stolen after the return is filed by the taxpayer and accepted by the IRS, with fraudsters then changing the bank account information to divert those funds. According to Intuit, between 24 and 40 taxpayers have been affected and about 24 of them used TurboTax. All of those customers had elected to have their filing fees taken from their refunds in a refund transfer.

After filing fees are withdrawn, refunds are transmitted to taxpayers with a deposit by Tax Products Group, owned Green Dot Corporation, a bank that works with tax-preparation firms. In these newly reported instances, taxpayers? personal information is obtained so the refunds can be sent to another bank account.

This season?s fraudulent activity was not limited to taxpayers using TurboTax, and Intuit has since beefed up the product?s security. Intuit offered to front tax refunds for customers affected by the latest incident, Intuit spokesperson Julie Miller told The Washington Post. In a company statement, Tax Products Group also said it has improved security measures.

Asked for further comment, Miller said Intuit had no statement beyond what she told The Washington Post.

Reply to
Scott W
Loading thread data ...

From: "Scott W"

In the future, please post the URL of the article where the text has been obtained from.

Reply to
David H. Lipman

Google it. I found 10 references.

In the future, please post the URL of the article where the text has been obtained from.

Reply to
Scott W

Google it. I found 10 references.

In the future, please post the URL of the article where the text has been obtained from.

Reply to
Scott W

From: "Scott W"

It is not the readers job to "Google it". You are the one who is reporting it. The URL is needed for two reasons.

The first is corroboration and accuracy. Anyone can copy text and then alter the text to change the information. the URL allows one to read the source and the copy and verify they are they are the same content.

The second is attribution. If you post the text and do not post a URL where you found it, that is plagiarism. You must attribute the source.

There are assholes on the net who fail to do this but I think you just made an honest mistake unlike the others who do it because it makes them feel important or for some other reason.

Reply to
David H. Lipman

From: "Scott W"

It is not the readers job to "Google it". You are the one who is reporting it. The URL is needed for two reasons.

The first is corroboration and accuracy. Anyone can copy text and then alter the text to change the information. the URL allows one to read the source and the copy and verify they are they are the same content.

The second is attribution. If you post the text and do not post a URL where you found it, that is plagiarism. You must attribute the source.

There are assholes on the net who fail to do this but I think you just made an honest mistake unlike the others who do it because it makes them feel important or for some other reason.

Reply to
Sharx35

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.