I moved from Denmark to the UK last year to take up work, so I'm not terribly familiar with British financial tradition (or even terminology). Please bear with me if the following are stupid questions.
When I moved, I kept the Visa card I have from my Danish bank. It works, but the overhead in exchanging sterling for Danish kroner and shipping them across the North Sea began bothering me. Also, an seemingly increasing number of online merchants refuse to accept credit cards issued by a non-UK financial institution. (Why, o why? Last time I bought a flight ticket, the British Airways webshop refused my card, and I had to go to a bricks-and-mortar place and pay a £15 surcharge).
So I went to the bank that receives my salary here and asked to have some plastic attached to my account. This bank is apparently still stuck in the 20th century and think that "credit" rather than "card" is the operative word, and hence they thought that I was asking to borrow money rather than just to have a way to spend online the money I already have. So they wanted to do a credit check, and eventually turned me down.
They offered the following wondrously vacuous explanation:
| We have been unable to grant your request at this time, principally | because your application did not pass our credit score. The credit | scoring system allocates points for each piece of relevant | information and adds these up to produce a score. When your score | reaches a certain level then we will generally agree your | application. If your score does not reach this leve, we may not.
and then added insult to injury by concluding,
| If there is additional information that supports your request that | we did not take into account in assessing your application, you may | contact us within 21 days, and ask us to reconsider our decision.
but *without* telling me which information they *did* take into account, thereby effectively preventing me from noticing what might have been missing. The bank has been completely uncooperative in helping me understand what they found wrong with my application.
Question 1: Can I expect less disrespectful rejections if I switch to another UK bank, or is this the common modus operandi of the UK financial sector?
The rejection letter also alluded that information from a credit reference agency called "Experian" may have been instrumental in deciding to reject me. However, the bank has explicitly refused to tell me what information they got from "Experian" about me.
I have never ever defaulted on any debt, so there is no reason why a credit reference agency would have any information about me at all, but there is still the possibility that they have *false* information about me (due to honest errors or identity theft or whatever).
However, "Experian" demands £2 from me before they will even speak about what they think they know about me. £2 is of course not a great amount of money, but it feels wrong to pay a company that has never provided me with any service (on the contrary: which I suspect is slandering me). It would feel like giving in to blackmail, or some kind of racket. What will they demand of me next if they see that I can be intimidated to pay £2 for services worth £0?
Question 2: Is "Experian" a legitimate business or just a bunch of modern-day mobsters with a fancy website? What right do they have to demand £2 from me? Will I get the £2 back if they turn out to have fradulent information on me? Or if they turn out to have no information on me?
Question 3: In Denmark, credit reference agencies are required by law to notify *me*, unsolicited, whenever they make an entry about me. Is this principle unheard of in the UK? I thought it was an EU rule.