At 01:50:27 on 11/08/2006, Tim delighted uk.finance by announcing:
Perhaps VISA/Mastercard doesn't actually want this information? Why would they want to hold a massive database that will be permanently out of date?
At 01:50:27 on 11/08/2006, Tim delighted uk.finance by announcing:
Perhaps VISA/Mastercard doesn't actually want this information? Why would they want to hold a massive database that will be permanently out of date?
You mean like Visa's database of ATMs. It includes one near me for a branch that closed about 10 years ago, whilst missing another which was installed at about the same time.
"Alex" wrote
Now it just sounds like you're trying to *create* problems!
You started-off effectively saying that "it's too difficult". But when shown how easily it could be produced (amalgamating acquirer's databases), you change tack and say that they wouldn't *want* to!
"Alex" wrote
They wouldn't - they'd continually update it, either whenever the acquirers update theirs, or at regular (frequent) intervals.
Or do you think that the acquirer's records of their merchants are "permanently out of date" ?
At 03:57:28 on 12/08/2006, Tim delighted uk.finance by announcing:
Let's look at the requirements then:
So it may make it slightly easier in the eyes of the cardholder at the expense of a major system change at the issuer/acquirer/card scheme end when they already have the chargeback system that works perfectly well as far as they're concerned.
Why should it be permanently out of date? It would be a distributed database with each individual acquirer holding up to date details of the merchants they deal with. Those acquirers would be networked with Visa/MasterCard so that queries could be performed from other organisations on the network.
Chris
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required