"The court heard how Murphy had set up a building society account with the Britannia under a false name, but staff had become suspicious about the amount of money being put through the account and contacted police. CID officers at Dewsbury, led by DC John Gee, obtained CCTV footage of the internet fraudster withdrawing funds from a branch of Britannia in Cheshire. He was subsequently arrested."
I don't get this at all. Certainly on both uk.legal and uk.finance, there have been numerous complaints about how stringent the money laundering leglisation is to the point of absurdity. It reads as if he was using a false name but the address was where his parents were living. How could he have presented fake ID (since banks want a passport, driving license, etc - not just a birth certificate) and even so, would they not have done a credit check on him, indicating no records under his assumed name?
Also, he made 22K. Is that really so much for the building society to get suspicious and call the police? I thought they just filled in some forms and set them to a central authority anyhow?