Ex-employer wants extra payment back

The time between the erroneous payment and the request to give it back was a month. Either the bank statement would show that it was spent in that month or it will not. If the money was still in the account at the time of the request to give it back, I think the OP would have to show that he had committed it to something that he could not get out of.

Besides which the OP will undoubtedly have to fill in a form showing income, expenditure etc. in order to ascertain what can and cannot be afforded. Never lose sight of the fact that although the ex-employer may have made a mistake, it is the OP who is in default as soon as he was told of the mistake. If you gave a shopkeeper a £20 note instead of a £5 note in payment of goods, and informed the shopkeeper as soon as you discovered your mistake (and the shopkeeper acknowleged that you had overpaid), what do you believe would be a reasonable repayment period for the shopkeeper to reimburse your £15? Would you be prepared to accept 6p per week for the next 5 years, for example?

The warning *is* the start of legal action (pre-action protocol). It would probably come in the form of a solicitor's letter. The OP would at that time probably be asked to pay back the amount *plus* the cost of the solicitor. From then on, every communication will bump up the legal costs. If he remains stubborn, the legal costs will quickly dwarf the amount of the overpayment.

Reply to
Cynic
Loading thread data ...

I'm not sure what he *did* write:

Peter : I have trouble with your posts - I suspect that you don't have your news software configured properly in that there is no leading character eg > on quoted text - it's difficult/impossible to see what you are quoting rather than adding yourself.

Reply to
scrambled egg

I would expect to be given a "slate" to which I could chalk up my future purchases of -say- a packet of crisps every day.

Perhaps our OP should offer to pay it back in kind, by doing the occasional spot of consultancy.

I would expect to be given notice before solicitors become involved.

Once one side feels that negotiations have gone as far as they can without leading to a satisfactory conclusion, they must (I feel) give the other side notice that if they don't stop playing silly beggars we'll pass the matter to our solicitors and you'll become responsible for the cost this involves. Unless notice in those or similar terms is given, I don't think there is a sound basis for adding fees to the debt.

But if it's a small claims matter, then there are limits to what can be added by way of expenses, aren't there?

Reply to
Ronald Raygun

(1) County Court Claim. To include interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984. Current rate: 8.00% p.a. - Likely but not certain to be awarded against you.

(2) Statutory demand. You pay up within 21 days or run the risk of being adjudicated bankrupt. You have no grounds on which to apply to set aside such a demand. You would find bankruptcy terribly inconvenient.

A lot of grief, by the sound of it. Maybe a CCJ. Maybe a bankruptcy Order. Why not just pay up? It's their money, not yours.

Reply to
Adrian Kelf

Do not let this distract from his postings. They are pretty well spot on and are worth paying attention to.

Reply to
Peter

In message , scrambled egg writes

Yes.. wot he said. Very difficult to read.

Reply to
Mike_B

Well, it depends what you've done with the money. If you had spent it in good faith a five year pay back time wouldn't be unreasonable. if you haven't spent it then it might be. In any case - the purposes of the offer is to start a negotiation on a payment schedule so I was envisaging you'd haggle.

Thom

Reply to
Thom

I don't think so. First, I think the assumption would be that your ex-employers was paying back pay or or other money owed. Every time I've moved jobs I've received back pay (usually, but not always, pay settlements back dated one or more years). Second, I think that you wouldn't need to have spent it (e.g., having committed it to a house purchase would also be acceptable).

Thom

Reply to
Thom

"Alex Heney" wrote

They certainly shouldn't expect any interest until the first possible date on which the money could be returned.

For instance, if the employer took a couple of days to provide details of a bank a/c to pay the money back to, and the bank transfer would then take say 3 working days, and there was a weekend in-between; then they certainly shouldn't expect any interest for those 7 calendar days -- even after being made aware of their mistake...

Reply to
Tim

What don't you think so?

Please provide some context for your replies.

Reply to
Alex Heney

The most obvious way to pay back the money would be to send a cheque. Interest would only accrue if the repayment was unreasonably delayed. A weeks' interest on £2500 is going to be negligible, so not really worth discussing. Don't forget that the OP would get to keep all the interest the money has accrued in his bank account up until the time he was notified of the mistake.

Reply to
Cynic

"Cynic" wrote

Exactly - *not* "from the date they made him aware", as Alex said.

Reply to
Tim

The plot thickens....

The reason I found out that they know about the money is from an email from the company accountant. I'm friendly with the guy and he mentioned in passing about the letter he'd sent about someone elses salary being paid to me.

Anyway, I did tell him that I'd not recieved the letter (which I haven't!). Haven't heard anything since !

Reply to
paulfoel

As you've gathered from the other posts, you have to pay the money back, and legally, the only profit you get to make is any accrued interest. Admin charges wouldn't hold up in court for a second - by all means try, but be prepared to reconsider quickly if they call your bluff.

As far as installments, you'd probably be taking the piss to try for any more than 6 months. What you could do is write to them, acknowledging their letter, and tell them you have asked your bank to provide a statement to verify their claim, and you will be deducting any fee for this from the amount they claim. A few weeks later, you can acknowledge their claim, but tell them you are seeking advice from your bank to ensure that the funds cannot be reclaimed electronically at a later date. They can't, but if you're just looking to delay things....

That should buy you a month or two fairly legitimately. After that, you can acknowledge the debt and offer to repay in installments of £500 or so - don't take the piss with this amount - make sure they would end up with the money at least as quickly as they would if they took you to court and all the aggro that would involve.

Meantime, make sure the cash is in a high interest-bearing account.

Reply to
TimB

Sounds reasonable enough. Not had the official letter yet mind !

Reply to
paulfoel

I'm not suggesting that there is any legal basis for such a charge, just that I think you'd have a reasonable chance of getting away with it, given that the alternative is all the expense and hassle of going to court.

Yes, money claim online is cheap, but someone still has to find the time to do it, and for a business, time is money.

Reply to
Adam

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.