'Iran 'moves assets out of Europe' and proposes that Opec nations slash crude production.

More credit tightening and higher oil prices on the way ?.................

Iran 'moves assets out of Europe'

Iran has started moving its foreign exchange reserves out of Europe in a bid to shield the country from the threat of sanctions, reports suggest.

Iran's central bank governor said the country had begun withdrawing assets from European banks, the Iranian Students News Agency reported.

Iran is embroiled in a row with the US and European Union over allegations it is attempting to build nuclear weapons.

Separately, Iran called for the Opec oil producing cartel to cut its output.

Oil prices in New York are currently at a four-month high of more than $67 a barrel.

Shifting assets

Iranian central bank governor Ebrahim Sheibani revealed earlier in the week that Iran had begun the process of shifting its assets from Europe, the Iranian Students News Agency said on Friday.

Iran has started withdrawing money from European banks and transferring it to other banks abroad

Iranian official

"We transfer foreign currency reserves related to all sectors including oil foreign exchanges to wherever it is good for us and we have started this transfer," the agency quoted him saying.

"Iran has started withdrawing money from European banks and transferring it to other banks abroad, " a senior Iranian official told the Reuters agency.

It was not immediately clear where the assets were being moved to, although reports have suggested that Iranian funds could be heading out of Europe to Asia.

The UN's atomic watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Authority, will hold an emergency meeting on 2 February to discuss whether to refer Iran to the United Nations Security Council.

Threat of sanctions

The council has the power to impose international trade or diplomatic sanctions against Iran.

Iran denies US and European allegations that it is seeking to build nuclear weapons, claiming it wants the technology for energy purposes alone.

Iran's assets in the US were frozen after the revolution of 1979, which saw the pro-Western Shah toppled and a clerical regime installed in Tehran.

Iran, which is currently the organisation's second-biggest exporter, has also proposed that Opec nations slash crude production by a million barrels a day from April.

Supporters of the proposal argue that world oil markets are already oversupplied, but critics have suggested Tehran is keen to flex its muscles given the country's current tense relations with the West.

formatting link
formatting link
"614

Reply to
Crowley
Loading thread data ...

how much is involved ?

any figures anywhere - obviously many billions i'd guess if not more

Reply to
Bored

this is a mickey mouse 'story' the numbers will be trivial and of very low relevance... the gdp is ~$1/2 a trillion p/a exports are about 1/10th of that.... imports a bit lower...a balance of ~$10-15 billion p/a.....

meanwhile as that is being whined about is putting the cash in banks they think can't be stopped so easily...the deposits are still liable to be in a similar basket of currencies....

trading will mean the transactional money will mostly be in and out of accounts in *very* short time spans

bored is a reasonable reaction to such fluff!

regards.....

Reply to
abelard

On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:15:00 +0100, abelard mysteriously appeared thru the usenet mist to inform us thus...

Translation: you haven't got a clue how much money the Iranians have deposited in Europe.

Reply to
hummingbird

glory you are seriously thik..... if you want such a figure i doubt it is easily traceable when dealing with such a secretive regime.... however, it is *simple* to make estimates from the figures i have given...

i will not tell you how because imv your behaviour suggests are not worth education

Reply to
abelard

The markets didn't think so..........

Big falls for Wall Street shares

Wall Street shares have suffered their worst single-day points fall since 24 March 2003, wiping out the gains made so far this year..................................................

"The market's been watching the earnings reports very closely. We got off on the wrong foot with Citibank and GE," said Evan Olsen, head of equity trading at Stephens.

"You've also had oil lifting higher with Bin Laden acting up and IRAN ACTING STRANGE, which is concerning going into a weekend, so people are taking profits."

formatting link
What odds on a "Black Monday" ?

Reply to
Crowley

Excellent news :)

Reply to
Chris X

On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:40:13 +0100, abelard mysteriously appeared thru the usenet mist to inform us thus...

Bluster.

Ah!!! so you don't have a clue, as I said. I don't have a clue either but I admit it.

Indeed it is, too simple, but it will give you no better idea than sticking a wet finger in the air. Your guess is based upon the assumption that Iran's assets are directly related to their two-way trade with Europe over the current year or so.

Look lardy, trying to calculate (guess in your case), what value of assets Iran has in Europe by looking at trade figures simply isn't relevant.

My *guess* is that the sums are not huge and not enough to rock the European banking system, although one or two banks might be inconvenienced depending how widely spread the assets are.

Reply to
hummingbird

markets don't think....

so what.... what is 'big'....convert it to %ages...

so what...

a moment ago you were trying to attribute it to iran moving a few billion from one bank to another....

an increasingly spent force...

so what...

bwahaha bbc!!

white monday only applied to the uk caused by a correction due to previous crazy behaviour by socialist johnny....

so...what do you mean by 'a black monday'.... and why would you care.....

this news is all positive.... oil is rising..it will tend to force adjustment....and a damned good thing much overdue...

formatting link
"The nuclear industry is pushing ministers to approve sweeping changes to the way atomic power stations are approved in an attempt to fast-track a new generation of reactors. Documents obtained under freedom of information laws show that British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL) wants to restrict the scope of local planning inquiries. Instead it proposes effectively discussing issues such as safety, security and environmental impact behind closed doors."

among your highest priorities should be to force fossil fuel substitution... so what if a few dippy yanks can't drive round in looney tunes wagons... so what the gdp grows more slowly for a year or three.....

meanwhile higher oil prices will give the m.e a chance to improve their societies if they have the wit to democratise and stop wasting talent...

you're just another panic monger living in blinkers forged by the fossil media.

Reply to
abelard

sorry buzzy...i cannot be bothered to read your inevitable blustering.. it is absolutely clear you know nothing and have no inclination to learn.

Reply to
abelard

On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:40:20 +0100, abelard mysteriously appeared thru the usenet mist to inform us thus...

Rotfl. Reading our exchange confirms *you* are doing the blustering.

Ah!!! now you've started ducking, weaving and throwing stones because you've been caught out blustering. Here's the previous exchange:

Bluster.

Ah!!! so you don't have a clue, as I said. I don't have a clue either but I admit it.

Indeed it is, too simple, but it will give you no better idea than sticking a wet finger in the air. Your guess is based upon the assumption that Iran's assets are directly related to their two-way trade with Europe over the current year or so.

Look lardy, trying to calculate (guess in your case), what value of assets Iran has in Europe by looking at trade figures simply isn't relevant.

My *guess* is that the sums are not huge and not enough to rock the European banking system, although one or two banks might be inconvenienced depending how widely spread the assets are.

Reply to
hummingbird

On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:39:23 +0100, abelard mysteriously appeared thru the usenet mist to inform us thus...

"Behind closed doors" is right up your street lardy: 'the State knows best', especially when big money is co-opted. What does that tell us about your claimed belief in government openness and FoI? hhmmm. Should I conclude that you're a fake?

Reply to
hummingbird

no use attention seeking buzzy...i open them...glance...more of the same...and bin them...

Reply to
abelard

On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:09:51 +0100, abelard mysteriously appeared thru the usenet mist to inform us thus...

No use wriggling lardy. Facts speak for themselves: You're a blusterer.

Reply to
hummingbird

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.