Mini Cash ISA / Interest Rate question

I'm considering getting a Mini Cash ISA. I'm wondering how to go about working out whether it is more financially beneficial to receive interest paid monthly or annually.

Am I right in thinking that if the interest rates are as follows:

a) Annually: AER Gross p.a variable (starting at 4.35%) b) Monthly: Gross p.a variable starting at 4.27%

that if the amount invested was for arguments sake was 100, after month 1 b) would be worth 104.27 whilst a) is still 100 but at the end of the year can be said to have been worth 104.35?

If that's so, then month 2: is a) 100 (108.89) and b) 108.72?

Is this right - will the 4.35 annual payment always be worth more at the end of the year than the slightly lower monthly payment? Or does the interest actually added monthly get added in and boost the ultimate end annual interest earned.

I guess I'm merely asking will 4.35% pa get me more money than 4.27 per month over the period of the year? I'm not sure its that obvious to work out myself. (I know that the rates will vary but remain in relation to each other as the rates vary. Money in my case will neither be added or taken away too to keep the scenario simple).

Thanks for any help.

Reply to
-
Loading thread data ...

Without a hint of irony, "-" astounded uk.finance on

07 Feb 2004 by announcing:

So you're thinking of IF then, yes? :-)

Not a chance. Monthly interest on 100 at 6.9% (since that's what I'm charged on my loan, that's what I get on my ISA) is just over 50p.

If you invest 100 and leave it there for 1 year then: If your AER is 4.35% then at the end of the year you'll have earned exactly

4.35 interest; If your AER is 4.27% then you'll have earned a maximum of 4.27 interest, possibly less if you withdraw the interest each month?

No. That would make your monthly rate 4.xx%, not your annual rate which would be nearer 67% - although it would be nice if you could get that.

I'd have thought so; that's the point of being quoted the AER after all.

Reply to
Alex

D'oh! Of course, I feel really stoopid now. Thanks for highlighting the obvious, what a plonker, can't believe myself sometimes...please ignore me from now on.

Reply to
-

Never mind the silly mistake of confusing monthly with annual rate.

Be sure. It is obvious to work out.

After a year, the (a) account will be worth 104.35% of the original balance. To work out the (b) account balance, what you do is divide

12.0427 by 12 (getting 1.0035583, which means the real interest rate is 0.35583% per month -- starting with 12.0427 is a shortcut which avoids the need for adding 1 were you to start by dividing 0.0427 by 12), and then raise this to the 12th power. You will get 104.35456%. As you can see, this is a little bit more than with (a).
Reply to
Ronald Raygun

Without a hint of irony, Ronald Raygun astounded uk.finance on 07 Feb 2004 by announcing:

Well it's not how IF works (which is, after all, the subject of this thread). An AER of 6.9% with the interest paid monthly returns around 0.5577% per month (compounded over 12 months gives a total of 6.9% - 1.00577^12 gets you

1.069). By your maths, it would actually be 0.575% giving an AER of 7.12%.
Reply to
Alex

Without a hint of irony, Alex astounded uk.finance on

07 Feb 2004 by announcing:

Actually, thinking about it, it should be the 12th root of the AER to get the monthly rate, rather than simply dividing by 12, no? 12th root of 6.9% is

0.5576% which ties in with my empirical results above.
Reply to
Alex

I neither know nor care how IF works, since it is *not* the subject.

Where do you get 6.9 from? The OP mentioned 4.35% AER or 4.27%pa monthly.

An account claiming to pay interest at 4.27%pa credited and compounded monthly *is* paying an effective annual rate slightly in excess of 4.35%.

Reply to
Ronald Raygun

Without a hint of irony, Ronald Raygun astounded uk.finance on 07 Feb 2004 by announcing:

Since the OP is intending to open a mini cash ISA with IF, it most certainly *is* the subject.

I could do exactly the same calculation with those figures, if you like, since I was getting those rates before I opened the loan with them.

No. It's paying 4.27% annually. That's why it's quoted as an annual rate.

Reply to
Alex

You can surmise what you like. The OP made mention neither of IF nor of 6.9%.

I'm not interested in what you could or could not calculate. Why not just stick with the figures supplied by the OP?

But it's not quoted as an AER or EAR or whatever.

Wrong. An account which claims to pay at an annual rate of 4.27% and says that interest is credited monthly, *is saying* that it operates a monthly interest rate of a twelfth of 4.27%, which of course compounds to an effective annula rate just over 4.35%.

Reply to
Ronald Raygun

"Alex" wrote

"Alex" wrote

Alex - you need to look *very carefully* at the IF info!

Eg - checking out their website, it is apparent (but not from the homepage, which simply quotes 4.35% AER whether paid monthly or annually) that :-

"ANNUAL INTEREST AER/Gross p.a." is 4.35%. and "MONTHLY INTEREST GROSS p.a." is 4.27%.

Note that the "monthly" figure is **NOT** quoted as an AER or APR or whatever. It is simply 12 times what the monthly interest rate is. Which - with monthly compounding - will give 4.35% AER. As Ronald quite rightly points out.

Reply to
Tim

Without a hint of irony, "Tim" astounded uk.finance on 10 Feb

2004 by announcing:

Sorry, you're both right.

Reply to
Alex

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.