Re: What is Money For ?

Nov 29, 2007 2 Replies


We will never see an end of ructions, we will never have a sane and steady


> administration until we gain an absolutely clear conception of money.

Mindlessly silly claim.


I mean an absolutely not an approximately clear conception.

Pity you clearly cant manage that yourself.


I can, if you like, go back to paper money issued in China in or about
> A.D. 840, but we are concerned with the vagaries of the Western World. Nope.
> FIRST, Paterson, the founder of the Bank of England, told his
> shareholders that they would profit because "the bank hath profit
> on the interest of all the moneys which it creates out of nothing."

Who cares what that fool said ?


What then is this "money" the banker can create out of nothing"?

No one can claim the same thing about your s*it, child.

I don't think this is correct. It also seems out of place in a discussion of money. If we speak only of money then this statement will be OK.

There are no "right people" when it comes to the distribution of money or the infusion of money into the economy/society. All should receive an equal amount of this "increase in the money supply". The "deserving" will have it soon enough.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required