This is a scary one

Loading thread data ...

7% is only a bit more than is usual - but according to article their pensions are "unusually lucrative".

Or have I missed something?

Reply to
Andy Pandy

Nope,

but I think he was referring to the implications of why they are doing it.

Personally, I don't see any problems for the UK should this bring down the Euro!

tim

Reply to
tim.....

That it's 7% on top of what they were previously contributing. I.E a 7% pay cut?

FoFP

Reply to
M Holmes

formatting link
>

They were not contributing anything.

That would indeed be the case if it was a pay cut but it is not, it is a contribution to a pension scheme - which means they will see a return.

And presumably they are exempt from the contribution if they decide to exempt themselves from the pension scheme.

Reply to
Yellow

formatting link
>>

A pension which they were entitled to before the were asked to contribute.

Apparently they might not.

No, it's compulsory. It's a pay cut in all but name. But given that the country is (apparently) up **** street, a pay cut that they are going to have to accept.

tim

Reply to
tim.....

formatting link
>

But that's no different to what loads of private sector pension schemes have done - ie up the employee conts or cut the benefits.

Reply to
Andy Pandy

Well it's not much different to the UK govt putting up NI - except that that affects every employee not just public sector.

Reply to
Andy Pandy

In Ireland that is almost every worker :-(

tim

Reply to
tim.....

formatting link
>>

Right, and seven minus zero equals what?

Any economist will tell you that it's the total deal that people look at, booth employer and employee. So a lower salary plus an non-contributory pension is much the same as a higher salary where you punt the difference into a pension fund.

Indeed at our University we recently moved to a non-contributory pensions scheme and cut the salaries by the exact amount of contribution. This saved NI contributions for both staff and employees.

By your analysis, we'd now be non-contributory employees and if they demanded the 7% already cut as another cut, then that wouldn't be a pay cut. Then presumably they could do it again and again until all our salaries wre done, without us ever having had a pay cut.

They were already seeing that return.

I wonder...

FoFP

Reply to
M Holmes
[snip]
[snip]

Almost all were indeed contributing, urban legend notwithstanding.

Reply to
Fergus O'Rourke

Looks like you have more knowledge than most. Would you care to enlighten us?

FoFP

Reply to
M Holmes

Yup - 350,000 out of a population of (IIRC) 3 million (which includes children, unemployed, pensioners, housewives etc) does seem an incredibly large public sector, probably close to 20% of employees!

Reply to
Andy Pandy

That's the same as the UK average (20%).

Reply to
Anthony Cunningham

Is that not what I just did ?

Reply to
Fergus O'Rourke

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.