Who pays for fraud via wireless keyboards & man-in-the-middle attacks?

Hey all, hypothetical scenario: let's say someone accesses my internet bank account with my passwords (no guessing) and transfers funds to a dodgy bank in Nigeria or even a UK bank account obtained using identity theft. The funds are then promptly drawn out in cash and laundered.

Presumably under the circumstances, the criminals will get away, the bank will deny any liability and I will be left footing the bill for the fraud. Ouch! Was it my fault for letting the criminals get my password? Maybe not.

This may not sound as "hypothetical" as it may seem. I refer you to:

formatting link

>My job involves reviewing computer security at a bank, and I was very >surprised to see that nearly all of the computers at one of my branches >are using these wireless mouse/keyboard combos. It seems like this could >be a potentially serious security risk,

In a nutshell, using wireless keyboards (which myself and even banks are guilty of) can result in appropriately equipped fraudsters "listening in" on your keystrokes and obtaining passwords, account details, etc. At the moment I believe many off the shelf consumer wireless keyboards do not come with strong encryption (if any), and those that do encrypt have a mostly untested (and thus uncertain) level of security.

Anyone who has experience with this sort of thing knows that most of the time, things don't come 100% secure out of the box; you expose it to the public, holes are found and they are plugged.

You as the customer might be paranoid about security and have done no wrong, but if your bank's tellers use wireless keyboards then in theory someone could just queue politely & surreptitiously at their local busy branch for 15 minutes (or fumble at the ATM), gathering all the keystrokes for deciphering later. You may have done no wrong but as the victim, but you will foot the bill.

Who pays for fraud as described above? Is the burden of proof under the circumstances on the customer to prove that they didn't act irresponsibly with their password data (hard to prove a negative...) or can they simply point fingers at the bank and say that the bank's IT security was lax?

Is it just me, or why aren't more people worried about this?

Reply to
sk8terg1rl
Loading thread data ...

The bank teller would not be typing your passwords so these people would need to have a sniffer in your living room to get them directly from you, so on that basis I am less than worried. :-)

Reply to
Bert

Fair enough, but the teller's passwords can be sniffed too, and they have the authority to transfer your funds to dodgy accounts. Probably (ironically) moreso than us as the customer. And yes, of course there is the bit about living room or office wireless sniffers as well. I just had one of those OMG "moments" while happily typing away on my wireless keyboard :-(

I'm also a bit ignorant about the information auditing process of banks and whether the consumer has any exposure to fallout from bank security loopholes. Any case examples on this particular subject would be most interesting.

Reply to
sk8terg1rl

It does seem extremely poor practice on behalf of the bank to use wireless keyboards for handling customer transactions whether passwords are entered or not. a possible exception is ewhere the keyboard to omputer link has strong encryption (Notice to patent trolls - thare may be prior art for this - if not there is now!).

Reply to
peterwn

Do you think that they use just passwords? I'd have thought two factor authentication would be more appropriate, even I use two factor authentication to log onto my home network.

That's one reason I don't do electronic home banking, as soon as my bank issues 2 factor authentication I'll start to use it.

Reply to
Martin

You would also need access to their software and/or their computer system or are you imagining that they conduct business in the bank via the same public portal we all have access to as customers at home?

You are just imagining that the way it all works is rather more simplistic than it.

Reply to
Bert

I just think it is rather arrogant to imagine that the banks wouldn't already have thought of all this and it must have taken them all of 10ms when the idea of wireless keyboards being integrated into their systems were first muted. :-)

Reply to
Bert

You were talking about passwords.

The bank tellers will not have access to your passwords. No bank staff will have access to your passwords at all. Some back room staff may be able to see the encrypted version, but will not be able to reverse engineer that to get the original.

Reply to
Alex Heney

Mine does (Nationwide).

You have (in addition to your customer number) one typed in password (which you set - actually a choice of three), plus a 6 digit pin, where the system asks you for 3 random digits from it, which you

*must* select from a drop down list using your mouse.
Reply to
Alex Heney

Just barely possibly, yes. But they may be encrypted, and there's more than one level of security in these bank systems. And then there's the issue of fraudsters getting physical access to the *internal* bank networks/systems, which is the only place these would work - *not* an easy proposition.

Not saying anyone should be relaxed about bank security, but the good old-fashioned methods of bribing or coercing bank employees, or placing a criminal 'insider' in a banking job are much more likely exploits IMHO.

Mike

Reply to
Mike Ross

But only from PCs connected and authenticated on the bank's internal network.

Reply to
Alex Heney

Sorry, that isn't 2 factor authentication.

That is one factor authentication "what you know" My bank does the same thing for phone banking, I don't use that either.

What you know + what you have + what you are

Reply to
Martin

I do not think I am being arrogant. Some pretty stupid things are done. It may not have occurred to the bank's IT people that there could be a potential security breach.

Reply to
peterwn

Right.

Like the way I access some of my client sites, using a "fob" which pops up a number when a button is pressed (or another one that just changes every 60 seconds).

TBH, I don't think that is practical for banks to do with their customers. I can't find anywhere that gives price lists for either SecurID or Safeword, which are the two I have used most, but I am pretty sure they are several 10's of pounds for each fob.

And similarly with card readers, or other similar technology.

Reply to
Alex Heney

formatting link
169

Reply to
Palindr☻me

If they're using a wireless keyboard, all you need to do is buy the same wireless keyboard set from your local PC world, plug it into a mobile computer, like a laptop, open up notepad, or MS word or something similar, then position yourself somewhere within the range of the transmitter. As if by magic, all the text that they type will appear on your screen, at the exact same time as it does on their screen.

Reply to
Swampy Bogtrotter

OK.

maybe it is more practical than I thought, although that is only for business customers, who make a lot more money for the banks on average.

Reply to
Alex Heney

And you really think you would not be noticed doing this (even if it were going to be of any use)?

Reply to
Alex Heney

LOL, No. I was just letting my imagination run away for a minute.

Reply to
Swampy Bogtrotter

All Swedish banks do it. (One of my colleagues even had one to access his company's web based timesheet entry system)

I was charged for mine. 100Kr (7.5 GBP) per year (or more accurately, I was charged for the internet banking which required the fob).

It seems a small price to pay for piece of mind.

tim

Reply to
tim(yet another new home)

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.