Anyone have a phone number for the Intuit hucksters?

My daughter needed to keep an eye on her finances.

Now, I could have had her use my copy, since my latest purchase was via download. But, she lives in her own home and I was installing to her computer. So, being averse to theft, I purchased for her a brand spanking new copy of Quicken Premier 2006, rather than have her use my copy. Immediate download from the Intuit website.

Too bad the toons at Intuit don't have the same moral compass.

They allowed a purchase from the website on 7/23 --- knowing that a newer version would be released within two weeks. Full price, too. No discounts. Now her 'new' software is a full year closer to sunset than it should be.

I used the customer service form to request an upgrade, but the email sent to me states I need to use the 60 day satisfaction guarantee to return the item. Since it was purchased electronically, I need to use a form on the website.

Click submit on the form - and it does NOT work. I figured it might be my firefox browser, so I used IE. Same problem. Broken refund form. Funny, but the purchase form worked fine when I used it.

I know I have another 50 days or so.. but I want it fixed now. Does anyone have a phone number for customer returns?

Reply to
Lisa C
Loading thread data ...

Electronically Delivered Products: You have 60 days from the purchase date to obtain a refund for product downloads, product unlocks, and all other electronically delivered Intuit media. Since there is no physical product shipped, you are not required to send anything back to the Returns Department. Refunds for electronically delivered Quicken products can be requested by contacting the Quicken customer service department via telephone at (800) 811-8766 from 5:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Pacific Time (Monday - Friday).

I got this directly off their website.

Reply to
MDB

Reply to
Stubby

Try this number:

1-800-YOU'RE OUT OF LUCK.

Welcome to morality....the Intuit way.

Reply to
Barnabas Collins

You people are all insane. Let me guess - you're the types to get upset when you buy a 2006 model year car, and then when you see the (always inevitable!) 2007, it keeps you up nights?

Reply to
Rich

  1. Be happy that your daughter isn't using fresh-release software from Intuit because its always full of bugs. Let them get the kinks out first.
  2. Quicken 2006 shouldn't sunset any sooner. I haven't read specific clauses about the sunset policy but I'd *think* the window is based on the end of the year (since they name their products by year) and not by when the subsequent product hit the market.

-- Tara

Reply to
scfundogs

When I buy software today i want it to work today right out of the box. I don't want thousands of bugs, I don't have time to spend lots of hours with non-existent customer support or customer support who speaks no english, has no clue what quick books are,

I'm older than dirt, i've been using computers for more years than you've probably been alive.

I know how much companies like Intuit charge for junk like Quick Books and all the bugs it ships with.

Reply to
Barnabas Collins

You can still use it. I've got copies of Quick Books 99 and Quicken

99 i'm still using now in 2006. I don't do payroll with it so it functions fine for me regardless.
Reply to
Barnabas Collins

I've been using Quicken since v6 (1996 release, I think), and have never really known it to be an overly buggy product. I beta tested the '01 and '02 versions, as well. Quickbooks, I don't know about (I just now noticed this was crossposted...ah well).

I'm a programmer/IT Manager by trade, so I guess I'm more tolerant when I see non-showstopper bugs in software. I also think Intuit is generous with their money-back guarantee; if people actually think they are a stingy company, you haven't bought enough software. I'm not a cheerleader for the company or anything - I think TurboTax is a POS - but for a consumer/small business software company, they're pretty good.

I'm still reading this group, hoping DeFaria will elaborate on Quicken '07's "horrific" beta. I'm debating picking it up when I swing through Costco this week.

Reply to
Rich

I've been using Quicken for about 15 years myself and I agree with all that you've written.

I didn't do any beta testing of Quicken 2007 so can't comment on that. However, I've been playing around with the released version of Quicken

2007 and I like how Intuit simplified some features instead of adding more features. I like how Q07 simplified the home page and made things easier for account set up. While I really like details, I think that Intuit hit the nail on the head by setting up a home page that simply reveals the bottom line uncluttered by details. It is easier to drill down for details, too. So far, I've not come across any bugs.

Just my opinion...

Shelley

----------------------- Shelley Elmblad About F>

Reply to
aboutfinsoft

I just find it interesting that Intuit is again going to put out a product for Mac that is an entire generation behind. The 2007 won't run in native mode on any Mac that Apple now sells. Of course this isn't the first time Intuit has abandoned Mac's and I'm sure it won't be the last. I don't know if it because to write a Mac program you actually have to make the user interface work, or if their code writers simply can't write code that doesn't explode with bugs when run on a real operating system. In any case Mac people will have to wait for a release past 2007 to get good performance from the program.

Reply to
Golden California Girls

It's not just Intuit. If you're looking for an OS that has lots of available applications for public consumption, Windows is the one to look at. The main complaint of almost every Mac user I've ever met is the lack of applications. ... And having worked in computers for close to 25 years, I've met a lot.

Regards,

Margaret

Reply to
Margaret Wilson

You're not using Windows are you?

Every version has it's bugs. Always has, always will.

I won't even go into the blue screen of death which i get in Quickbooks/Quicken. And this is in XP which isn't supposed to do that.

Reply to
Barnabas Collins

It is simply not possible to "have met a lot [of Apple users]"

Reply to
HeyBub

Well even if I concede on that one (which I don't), it would be another reason why there's not much software out there for Macs....

Regards,

Margaret

Reply to
Margaret Wilson

At the risk of offending the Mac zealots and the Microsoft bashers in the same response, it's a simple matter of freshman college economics.

One platform has 5% market share and the other has 95%. It makes no difference how user friendly or technologically superior one is over the other (remember the Beta vs. VHS video recorder wars?). You have to spend money to write, sell, enhance, and support software. You have to make a profit to continue to keep the resources employed.

If you were CEO of Intuit, where would you put your expensive resources to ensure your continued viability?

sb

Margaret Wils> HeyBub wrote:

Reply to
slb

My understnding is Apple has 10% of the desktop market.

That having been said Apple if it were smart could bury Microsoft by playing up the advantages of the Mac over the pc (plug and play that works, an OS that doesn't lock up every hour, and viruses/etc. Mac has what one virus now?

Apple has one distinct advantage. It ain't Bill Gates with a huge target on his back.

Reply to
Barnabas Collins

And that advantage is now gone for Micro$oft since the Mac runs on an Intel chip and runs Windows.

Apple has all the tools it needs to bury Micro$oft.

But now that Mac runs the Intel chip you can have a dual boot system where on of the boots is into Windows.

Of course you realize Bill Gates stole an OS from Apple a number of years ago, that is what is now called Windows.

Apple in their infinite wisdom never copyrighted their OS.

Catch Pirates of Silicon Valley if you can.

In lieu viruses/spyware/hackers/etc. for Windows and the abscence of same for the Mac as well as an OS that doesn't crash every hour Apple could very easily crush Micro$oft like a bug.

Reply to
Barnabas Collins

Please remove Quickbooks from the overly-beaten dead horse of Apple vs. Microsoft. It doesn't belong here and, just so y'know, Mac supporters do their favorite OS (and, by extension, favorite hardware) manufacturer harm when they bash MS. Take it to comp.sys.mac.apps where bashing MS & Windows is the rule of the day.

-- Tara

Reply to
scfundogs

It's not beating a dead horse; Micros~1 supplies more software for Macs than anyone else -- including Apple.

Reply to
HeyBub

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.