Heck, we are in a Google Group on Quicken...Of COURSE we are discussing whether it should post from oldest to newest or newest to oldest. No need to leave text!
AARP has a nice feature on their otherwise dreadful groups, it puts a link to the original message.
And finally to Andrew: If I am using my bath, it is up or down depending on ....... In the half bath in the hall, I try to keep it down. Seems polite.
"Mr.Jan" wrote in news:00d3c28d-0f2b-42bc-9cd3- snipped-for-privacy@v23g2000vbi.googlegroups.com:
So sorry, Jan, you are using Google groups as a gui to access . So you are participating in usenet, not a commercial forum, in spite of giving revenue to google through its ads.
Google is great for searches, however for UseNet access it TOTALLY sucks. There is absolutely NO NEED to use Google to access UseNet and there are some fine FREE servers available, such as the one I use, "aioe.org".
Google groups that are user added function just like yahoo groups. You can access them online in a web format or via e-mail messages. They are not Usenet groups and do not get propagated to the news servers maintained around the world.
Google also provides access to Usenet groups such as this one for those folks that do not have have access to a news server.
Unfortunately spammers have found that it is easy to send spam using Google groups interface and there are efforts to filter out messages sent using Google groups. You commented about the spam that you see in this group. I see very little spam because the news server that I use filter out the spam.
Yes, but they are greatly inferior to Usenet, in my view. The only thing Google is good at, with respect to groups, is searching messages posted on Usenet. They are the best at that.
I strongly recommend you dump Google for what you're using it for and replace it with a real newsreader. You will likely find it a much better experience (once you get used to the newsreader).
Well, the older I get, the more I don't know. I didn't like the Google groups thing and now I see what is causing it. I much prefer the style of Yahoo Groups and I keep an ID over there for such things. On the other hand, this is a very good group regardless of how I get to it and I like getting the summary every morning. So, use more than one vendor seems to be the rule.
-- Three messages ago you read: Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?
Two messages ago you read: Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?
A: Bottom-posting.
In the previous message you read, after scrolling down: Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?
A: Bottom-posting.
Q: Why is bottom-posting such a bad thing?
And now, if you scroll down far enough, again, you learn:
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?
A: Bottom-posting.
Q: Why is bottom-posting such a bad thing?
A: Because since every moron quotes everything in the message to which they are replying, you end up reading the same stuff again, and again, and again until you barf.
BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.