I would appreciate any tips and information anyone could provide for quickly optimizing the Checkbook, Investment and Reporting features of Quicken 2004 to mimic earlier versions of Quicken. I agree with the negative (and positive sentiments) concerning Quicken 2004 and Quicken
2005 verses earlier versions, I've been forced to migrate to Quicken 2004 Premier from Quicken 2002 Deluxe because of the sunset provisions.I use Quicken's Checkbook features to keep track of my cash flow, the Investment registers to track the fluctuating value of security portfolios by downloading daily security prices. I prefer to use .QIF downloads and imports instead of any type of direct connection for privacy and data backup reasons, taking care to name my accounts so that Quicken will not recognize them. Has anyone found a efficient way to download and import security pricing into Quicken by alternative routes? Is anyone running both Quicken 2004/2005 and an earlier version, downloading security prices with the latter version and exporting to the earlier version?
Quicken is limited in it's Investment handling capabilities, mainly due to it's limited number of transaction codes, limited abilities in handling corporate spinoffs and mergers and lack of any useful auditing functions. Better to use a dedicated portfolio management software package to watch portfolios of any complexity. Quicken is strictly for "ballpark numbers."
I've read the great tips from John Pollard and others on how to handle the Cash Flow Report Exclude Internal Transfer "change" in Quicken 2004:
"Unfortunately, Exclude Internal does not work the same way in Q2004 as it did in previous versions, or as it works in Q2005 (which *does* work like pre-Q2004 versions). In Q2004, Exclude Internal only excludes transfers where the TO account *is* the FROM account (as in Opening Balance entries).
The only way to achieve the equivalent of Exclude Internal in Q2004 is by excluding the individual [Account] categories."
Any other suggestions on how to make Quicken's reports more accurate, as Intuit has not included easy-to-use parameters in their report customization, other than the "Garbage In, Garbage Out" principal?
I believe Intuit is moving towards an on-line subscription based product line and away from the simple checkbook package it started with. Too bad for U.S. customers Intuit did not adopt a yearly subscription renewal model so that users could stay with a Quicken version they liked and learned to use, as other software companies have.