An Open Letter To The Shareholders Of British Gas

Dear British Gas Shareholder,

Yesterday, July 24, I received yet another letter from Moorcroft Debt Recovery Limited threatening me with legal action unless I pay them £30.49 on behalf of their client.

In all honesty I have lost count of the number of threatening letters I have received on behalf of British Gas from not one but two debt collectors. I know from personal experience that a solicitor's letter is likely to cost at least £40 at today's rates, and I doubt debt collector's letters are any less.

This means that British Gas have wasted hundreds of pounds of your money chasing this non-existent debt. There was an interval of about six months at one point, probably they were hoping I had lost or destroyed the correspondence; I am sorry to disappoint them but I have retained all the relevant correspondence; indeed I have scanned it with a view to putting it on-line.

I must admit, I have long since tired of this nonsense; even threatening these morons with police action has not made them desist, so any further letters from them will go straight into my waste paper basket, unless of course they are so stupid as to actually issue a writ, in which case they will lose in the County Court, face total humiliation, and waste even more of your money.

I thought you might like to know that.

Below is my latest E-mail to them; it is the last I will bother to send.

Please note this address is not valid for E-mail.

Yours A Baron

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------

93c Venner Road Sydenham London SE26 5HU

July 17, 2008

I have, yesterday, received yet another letter from debt collectors instructed by you. I have no idea how many hundreds of pounds you have wasted chasing this phantom debt but I can assure you that if you are ever stupid enough to actually sue me, your shareholders will find out.

Below is the e-mail I sent your previous debt collector last year; any further communications from them or from those other idiots at Moorcroft will be ignored.

A Baron

my reply of October 2, 2007 Subject: Your Reference B5942436

I refer to your letter of September 27 on behalf of British Gas. You state that your clients are unaware of any legitimate reason for a claimed non-payment of £30.49. I would refer you to my letter to Lois Hedg-peth of their grandly titled Customer Services Department of August 14, and to all the previous letters which they have ignored. I am unaware of any legitimate reason I should pay any sort of late payment charge for a delay which was entirely their fault. Likewise I am unaware of any reason I should pay them £14 for receiving unsolicited letters. If you can find a legitimate reason for either of the above perhaps you would like to copy me the relevant statute or case law. As I told your client previously, as a journalist I am not amenable to the sort of threats that scare little old ladies ?The police may be there when we call? etc, so you can take your client?s formal demand for £30.49 and shove it up your jacksey.

If you intend to sue me go ahead and do so, and I?ll see you in court where you will lose heavily. Any other correspondence I will regard as unwarranted persecution and will refer it to the police as it may fall within the remit of the 1997 Protection From Harassment Act.

Otherwise sod off and don?t bother me again.

Yours finally, A Baron

Reply to
thedarkman
Loading thread data ...

So.........there's no chance of getting that £4.50 you borrowed of me two years ago then???

Reply to
EricP

I've recently gone through something similar with my previous insurance company (Budget Insurance).

My tactic was to only communicate with them in writing and to copy every single letter to the Insurance Ombudsman.

Budget Insurance chose to ignore all my letters disputing the debt, and pass the alleged debt to a debt collector (CARS Ltd).

Whilst the ombudsman didn't react immediately, as Budget's (lack of) response became more and more unreasonable and the reasonableness of my own behaviour more and more apparent - the ombudsman stepped in.

Suddenly someone very intelligent and positively fawning at Budget wanted to talk to me, and couldn't be more eager to resolve matters.

Silly billies. Following their own code of conduct, or even their own terms of contract would have cost them far less.

Reply to
dom

It does not work like this. Utilities like British Gas AFAIK pass their debtors lists to debt collecting companies to see what they can do with them and the debt collectors either taske a commission from what is recovered or add their costs to what is owing. It would seem they have a certain period with the list then the utility will give the list to another firm etc.

The letters would not cost anything like 40 pounds to send out, as they simply have a standard series of dunning letters which are 'personalised' with the debtor's name, address and amount. This is why the letters do not refer to or answer the points made in any letters you send, they just run a robot operation.

Reply to
peterwn

====================================== I was about to post something along these lines.

I'm wondering is this a deliberate, organised racket by service providers and large retailers, to make money out of debt collection agencies by selling them fake, non-existent debts?

Three of them have issued fake bills to me, then gone through the usual seemingly endless series of letters, then a debt collection agency takes over, finally the debt collection agency phones me and I tell them it's a fake bill and they've been had, and if they take me to court they will not only lose but get a counterclaim for harrassment and fraud and have to pay me compensation and costs.

It is important to be sure of your ground, to know that the bill is a fake, then to record phone calls from them and to them (inform them at the outset that you are recording the call, to keep it legal), send them a letter (signed for) and make a copy of the confirmation of delivery on the Royal Mail website, and keep all relevant documents.

Then, when a debt collection agency finally connects with you by phone, you can tell them they've been had and that these firms are laughing at the debt collectors as they make money out of them by selling them non-existent debts.

Reply to
Special.Care03

======================================== The sad part is that, so far, this racket has probably been sustainable, because some people will pay a relatively small fake bill to keep their credit rating on track, and some others will be intimidated by the aggressive letters and doorstep harrassment, and some people are so feeble-minded that if you write to them often enough they will come to believe what you are saying to them.

It may also be that these firms are in league with New Labour's policy of crushing the spirit of freedom in England by passing endless laws to control every detail of our lives and make us afraid to open our mouths to speak for fear of 'offending' someone or other or of breaking one of these obscure 'laws' that nobody's ever heard of. Forcing us to doubt our own perceptions by telling us we owe money which we don't owe is an additonal way to wear us down and break the spirit of freedom and pave the way for the coming full-scale EU/NAFTA/ AU/ASEAN global dictatorship. All things are connected.

Reply to
Special.Care03

thedarkman gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying:

British Gas doesn't HAVE any shareholders, and hasn't had for eleven years.

Reply to
Adrian

By the way, did you see the final episode of "The Prisoner" on ITV4 a few days ago. It's worth keeping in mind as they try to wear you down with their fake "laws" and their fake "debts."

Reply to
Special.Care03

That's a shame. I was going to monitor it today to see it plummet.

Or rise.

Reply to
Norman Wells

I assume that if you wanted to show that you were a regular smart-arse with little to contribute in general, you may say:

"British Gas doesn't HAVE any shareholders, and hasn't had for eleven years."

If you were wanting to be genuinely helpful you could say something along the lines of:

"Actually - there are no shareholders in BG anymore - Centrica was formed in February 1997 following a demerger from British Gas plc and is now the parent company of British Gas."

Which category would you be in?

Reply to
judith

The category of those who wish to make Judith's arse smart.

Reply to
Special.Care03

"Norman Wells" gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying:

Really? Would you care to give me the LSE code for British Gas shares?

Reply to
Adrian

judith gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying:

The category that's also heard of BG Group PLC, thanks.

Reply to
Adrian

In all honesty I have lost count of the number of threatening letters I have received on behalf of British Gas from not one but two debt collectors. I know from personal experience that a solicitor's letter is likely to cost at least 40 at today's rates,

I bet you do if you use this tone with everyone who irritates you!

Reply to
Mary Fisher

I once bought a property ,where the previous owner had died. There was an outstanding gas bill of 76. This was from an estimated reading. Went through BG's sequence of ever more threatening letters. I had phoned them, told them it wasn't my bill and it was estimated, but gave this up as it is a life consuming process.

Eventually they sold this debt to a debt collecting agency....got their letters. Then a second agency. After about two years of playing the game, got told if I didn't pay in 10 days they would take me to court. I phoned them and said " no need to wait 10 days, take me to court"... this left the guy a bit flustered..." no, it doesn't work like that". The letters kept arriving until I eventually moved.

mark

Reply to
mark

This is not a FAKE as such, there was a genuine dispute but they are in the wrong, and I have the correspondence to prove it. I was getting pissed off with these letters but now I will simply ignore them unless they are so stupid as to file for this imaginary debt, which I doubt.

As for the guy wh said British Gas does not have shareholders, if they are owned by Centrica, then Centrica are the shareholders; I've just checked the Companies House website, and this seems to be a public limited company.

Reply to
thedarkman

This is not a FAKE as such, there was a genuine dispute but they are in the wrong, and I have the correspondence to prove it. I was getting pissed off with these letters but now I will simply ignore them unless they are so stupid as to file for this imaginary debt, which I doubt.

As for the guy wh said British Gas does not have shareholders, if they are owned by Centrica, then Centrica are the shareholders; I've just checked the Companies House website, and this seems to be a public limited company.

You ARE a busy little bee aren't you!

Reply to
Mary Fisher

On the whole I think that these sort of bully-boy tactics from debt collectors are disgraceful.

However, in the case of someone as unpleasant as Alexander Baron I have to say it couldn't happen to a better person!

Reply to
Anita Palley

My word - I see that really are a smart-arse.

Just to clinch it - (the uncertainty - not your arse), perhaps you can now tell us what BG Group plc has to do with the supply of gas by British Gas to the OP - rather than Centrica as I suggested?

Reply to
judith

Well summed up, Anita!

Mary

Reply to
Mary Fisher

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.