Liquidating assets (woolworths)

So, are they , the buyers, going to open up the high Street branches again, or what? That old familiar gold and red shopfront name was just a kind of permanent part of every town and city, it's hard to imagine it not there any more.

Reply to
Ian
Loading thread data ...

The guys who bought the Woolworths name were on TV today. They were very reluctant to say how much they had paid.

Does the Administrator not need to put this information in the Public Domain in order to prove that he got the best deal?

tim

Reply to
tim.....

I suppose you "prove" you got the best deal by auctioning the asset to whoevever offers the most for it.

Reply to
Troy Steadman

I suppose you "prove" you got the best deal by auctioning the asset to whoevever offers the most for it.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The implication was that he did that, but using closed offers. If he doesn't reveal the winning bid, how will the others know that the process was fair?

tim

Reply to
tim.....

The Barclay Brothers (ching ching loads o' money $$$$$$$$$).........they are keeping the name and operating from the internet only.

Reply to
Ten Pin Bowling

NO...

formatting link

Reply to
Ten Pin Bowling

Don't they always sell them for a pound?

Reply to
Mark

Usually that's all they are worth.

I think "Woollies" is so iconic that it ought to be worth a bit more,

tim

Reply to
tim.....

As part of the receivership or liquidation process the Administrator will have to file a receipts and payments account at companies house. I believe this may be quarterly. Sooner or later it will be in the public domain. I wish the name had been bought by someone willing to reopen at least one high street store. I can't see much point putting the Woolworths name onto an existing online business. There is no continuity and it won't fool anyone!

Reply to
T

Bitstring , from the wonderful person T said

The point is probably the brands (Chad Valley, Ladybird, etc.) which are not available any place else. I guess maybe you'll have online pic 'n' mix, but I doubt they've much of a hook there...

Reply to
GSV Three Minds in a Can

No. Not in the case of an asset with no liability attached to it. If someone had been prepared to buy the whole company, and take on its liabilities, then it would have almost certainly gone for a pound.

Reply to
Jonathan Bryce

Yes, but then I never bought anything from my local Woolworths in the last

10 years, and I don't know anyone else who has either. That's why they're not here anymore.
Reply to
Jonathan Bryce

An old age pensioner being interviewed on the local radio on the announcement of Woolworth closing "It's a shame they are closing, I used to shop their as a young girl" Says it all really.

Shops full of cheap 'tat' that could be bought cheaper elsewhere.

Reply to
Alan

I did in the last 30 minutes - a large pile of childens DVDs for peanuts, which I gave to my nephew.

I used to use Woolworths occationally. It used to have a good isle of electrical bits and pieces, which was handy in the high street rather than having to drive out to one of the DIY sheds. That good selection gradually drindled to just a shelf of light bulbs. Meanwhile, the likes of Wilkinsons took over much of that trade which had traditionally gone to Woolworths.

I don't think their demise was inevitable -- it was entirely of their own doing.

Reply to
Andrew Gabriel

We found woolies very useful for cheap childrens' clothes.

Reply to
Mark

And where would you go for clothes for expensive children?

ObGrammar: It should be "children's".

Reply to
Ronald Raygun

Oh boy, a grammer lesson on uk.finance! Do I have to do 1000 lines. teacher?

Reply to
Mark

Makes a change from arithmetic, eh?

I think you mis-spelled a comma there.

Reply to
Ronald Raygun

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.