MBNA 0% balance transfers - BEWARE !!!!

Can't believe they can do this...

Had £12000 on a 0% balance transfer deal with MBNA. Paid the minimum payment of £5 every month by standing order.

Last month, they changed the terms and conditions and changed the minimum payment to £10. Yes, I know I should have checked my statement...

Anyway, by accidentally not making the minimum payment, I got charged £12 late payment fee, they removed my 0% balance transfer deal, and charged me interest of nearly £200 !!!!!!

One simple mistake by me and it costs me £200+ !!!!!

Spoke to their customer services and they really couldnt care less. Even though they understood what had happened they refuse to budge. Opportunistic or what ???? The thing is I've had an MBNA credit card for about 20 years and this is how they treat me.

I know a lot of you are going to say it was my fault for not checking but, I do think its very opportunistic of MBNA to do this.

Reply to
paulfoel
Loading thread data ...

I'm not going to say this at all. Companies can't expect you to read their T&C each month to see if they have changed, it not a reasonable thing for them to do at all.

I recommend that you escalate this up the company and then complain to the Banking ombudsman (assuming it is he who handles credit cards - someone will correct me if it's not)

tim

Reply to
tim (not at home)

Tim,

Yes. I have now put my concerns in writing to them to see what they say. In my experience, you normally get a more considered response than speaking to an agent on the phone.

No - agreed they cant expect you to read the T+Cs every month (although they do say they did send me a letter), however, I suppose they can expect me to read my statement every month.

The thing is I'm not saying it wasnt my fault - it was - its just that the penalties now imposed on me for a simple mistake seem rather severe.

Reply to
paulfoel

You don't need to read the T&Cs. It's on the statement (the minimum payment amount).

Andy

Reply to
Andy Hawkins

"tim (not at home)" wrote

Perhaps that's true, but surely they *can* expect you to read the "minimum payment" shown on their statement?

"tim (not at home)" wrote

... now there's a "blast from the past"!!

Reply to
Tim

When you say 'Banking Ombudsman' do you mean Financial Ombudsman Service, otherwise known as FOS?

Rob Graham

Reply to
Rob graham

Yes. Agreed. I should have noticed...

but like I said, my issue is their inflexibility of a minor mistake on my part which is costing me so much in interest fees....

Reply to
paulfoel

I'm doubtful if I'd have a case, would I? They have acted within their T+Cs and it was my fault after all.

All I can say is that its a little unfair, thats all. Surely the Ombudsman wouldnt intervene here?

Reply to
paulfoel

I think they might. What's happening with the excessive penalty charges saga? This must surely count, since the interest being charged is in effect a penalty for not complying with the T&C's.

Reply to
Andy Pandy

I was in a very similar situation several years ago. I paid my minimum 5 about 8 days late (I thought I had paid it), then missed one statement so by the time I realised they had removed my 0% balance transfer deal I had paid about 280 interest.

It was of course my fault as I should have read the T & C's, paid the 5 on time, and noticed it on my first statement (as it would have been less).

However I argued that to end up paying 280 as a result of paying 5 8 days late was totally disproportional, and that I would be prepared to pay something like 10 or 15 and they should refund me the rest.

I went through their Customer Services and wrote to various people within the company and was offered over 100 back, but I was still paying a penalty of over 150.

In the end I wrote to the Financial Ombudsman and (surprise, surprise) within a few weeks someone else in their Customer Services rang me to say it had all been a mistake and they would refund me the whole amount.

I suggest you pursue it as far as you reasonably can with MBNA, then if you are not satisfied with the outcome, write to the Financial Ombudsman.

Let us know how you get on.

Adrian

Reply to
Jon

Adrian,

Thanks for the advice. I'll certainly do that...

Reply to
paulfoel

I had a similar tale a few months ago, where I transferred a balance to a card. I rang to check I still had a direct debit set up on the account (i'd had it for years), and was forced to use their automated service - it said there was already a direct debit set up, so I couldn't set up another.

When the bill came, no payment had been taken, and they were now claiming there was no DD set up, and charges were added, transfer rate removed etc.

I did manage to get the original transfer deal reinstated after speaking to a couple of the customer service guys on the phone (got nowhere the first time, had to call back) - I pointed out that I could prove i'd rang their freephone information line when I said I did, and would take it further since it was giving out incorrect information.

I did end up paying a few pence in interest on the interest, but I couldn't be arsed arguing over that given it was saving me several hundreds of £££

Reply to
Colin Wilson

[snip]

Not necessarily. If it has been 5 "for ever", it is not unreasonable for the cardholder to overlook it.

The OP should certainly complain to the FOS, if MBNA persist.

Why this enormous deference towards T&Cs ?

One side to a contract has no right to arbitrarily and/or without sufficient notice change the terms of the contract without drawing adequate attention to the change. (It can indeed only be done at all if the original contract permits it). Adequate attention-drawing requires more than simply changing the amount on the next monthly statement.

Reply to
Fergus O'Rourke

Surely it's better to have paid the minimum by direct debit rather than standing order, then this wouldn't have happened. But as others have said, keep on complaining to MBNA and, if that doesn't work, go to the Financial Services Ombudman.

Regards,

Reply to
David Uri

Yes. Agree. It was not clever of me to pay by SO rather than DD.

Would the FSO look at something like this though? As others have said, MBNA havent really broken any rules, and it was my fault ultimately. All they could be accused of is maybe being a bit opportunistic.

Reply to
paulfoel

Yes. Agree. It was not clever of me to pay by SO rather than DD.

Would the FSO look at something like this though? As others have said, MBNA havent really broken any rules, and it was my fault ultimately. All they could be accused of is maybe being a bit opportunistic.

---------------------------------------------

I see no reason why not. Just console yourself with the thought that the bank will get a bill from the Obundsman which is bigger than the sum you are arugeing about

tim

Reply to
tim (not at home)

Can't believe they can do this...

Had 12000 on a 0% balance transfer deal with MBNA. Paid the minimum payment of 5 every month by standing order.

Last month, they changed the terms and conditions and changed the minimum payment to 10. Yes, I know I should have checked my statement... ======= The 0% deals usually have a percentage minimum payment rather than a fixed monetary sum don't they?

The ones I've had usually seem to be min 3% of o/s balance per month so it changes each month forcing me to check my statement otherwise i don't know how much to pay.

Reply to
Adrian Boliston

No, i've got ~£5k on an Abbey card (now part of MBNA) and the minimum payment on that is only £10

Reply to
Colin Wilson

Credit card companies do send out letters advising changes to T&C. I guess most people bin them unread.

Reply to
s_pickle2001

In this instance, I cant remember having recieved one, but like you said, I may have just binned it...

Reply to
paulfoel

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.