OT: Paying for TV Licence

My TV Licence expires at the end of this month and, since I shall be
away when it expires, I applied for a replacement on-line using my
CapitalOne credit card. I asked for a paper licence to be sent by post
rather than settling for an 'electronic' one.
I received a confirmatory email that my licence had been renewed. A few
days later, the new paper licence arrived in the post - valid until
October 2011.
However, I noticed something slightly odd with my credit card
transactions. Purchases made using a CapitalOne credit card first show
up in a 'Pending' category on their on-line system, and move into
'Current Transactions' when they have been fully processed. In my case,
there were TWO (i.e. duplicate) pending transactions - each for the full
£145.50
After a few days, both of these pending transactions disappeared, but
neither made it into the 'Current transactions' list.
A few days later still, I received a letter from TV Licensing saying
that "due to a technical problem" they had been unable to process my
payment and had thus revoked my licence - and I still needed to pay.
My immediate reaction was to think that, if challenged, I could produce
a licence valid until October 2011, and that if they couldn't organise
themselves to collect my payment properly, that was THEIR problem - not
mine.
However, I thought that I probably wouldn't get away with that, so I
rang their helpline and - after tearing them off a strip - gave them
details of a *different* credit card (Halifax) to use for the payment.
They said it had gone through ok.
That was several days ago, but it still hasn't appeared on my Halifax
on-line list of transactions. Halifax don't display pending transactions
- but the available credit *has* gone down by the requisite amount.
I'm wondering what to do if it never shows up as a proper transaction on
my Halifax card.
I am in possession of an apparently 'valid' licence and have bent over
backwards to pay them. What is my position if they fail to collect it a
second time?
Reply to
Roger Mills
I'm sure you'll find some fine print that says the licence is not valid if the payment fails. It probably doesn't say anything about the reason for failure either.
If I were you I'd just make certain you document everything you can that shows you did the right thing at the right time, and be prepared if necessary to send them photocopies of all of it with a cheque.
Rod.
Reply to
Roderick Stewart
Santander has a history of making mistakes. I was reading a similar story on the MSN forum earlier today: .
Message number 7 in that thread:
----- Begin Quote -----
They cancelled one of my dd and neither they nor the cc company told me it had been cancelled so it caused loads of problems and additional charges.
----- End Quote -----
Reply to
Martin Jay
The answer is obvious, innit?
The person in question cannot see over the garden hedge or fence, so by standing on the monitor (or stack of monitors) outside, they can peer over the garden hedge or fence and watch out for the TV Licencing inspectors and their van in the road.
Reply to
J G Miller
What the person said was: ".. [so] we can watch them standing outside on our monitors". That's ambiguous, and I read it as saying that they can watch the inspectors as they (the inspectors) are standing on the monitors. It would be some sort of ritual: Having found a monitor (which to all intents and purposes looks like a TV) they would get all excited, climb up on to it and perform some kind of bizarre victory dance on it.
Reply to
Ronald Raygun
Don't worry, they're clearly not all locked up yet.
Or maybe that should be worry.........................
Reply to
Woody
If the available credit has reduced that would suggest that the Halifax have authorised the transaction. You could always ask the Halifax what has happened.
Reply to
Michael Chare
In message , Chris Leuty wrote
I noticed that as well - from one of the better rated banks to one of the worst rated !
Reply to
Alan

Site Timeline Threads

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.