BT Line Fault Charges

Oct 07, 2004 7 Replies

Firstly please forgive cross posting - am unsure which group would be best placed to help....



During the heavy thunderstorms in August, a friend of mine lost the use of her telephone and modem. Computer repairer says modem was knocked out my lightening and replaced it. Now she has received her telephone bill showing a 50 charge which BT say is because the damage caused to her telephone line was due to her having a computer using the same line.



This sounds like complete rubbish to me and she has asked me to pen her a letter refuting this, but I would of course prefer to know that I'm not talking utter rubbish before I do so...any help/advice would be welcome.



L

I suggest that you point out that it was a modem approved for use in the UK (assuming it was).

R

But you haven't cross-posted it!

It is possibly not rubbish - the lightning may have caused a power line surge which found its way to the phone line. Try uk.telecom for better informed opinions.

Whether she is contractually responsible for damage orignating from an Act of God I cannot say. House contents insurance may cover it if she is.

But the OP specifically referred top damage to the telephone line being charged for.

If line damage exists, then what was the damage? Details from the OP say that the line was not working because a damaged modem caused line problems. OP cited a specific chain of events - including a service charge - for a problem created only by a defective modem.

Of course, we require further details from the > >> You have misconstrued facts. Lightning destroyed her modem

Her modem was alright until an undetermined number of kilovolts came down the BT line and fried it.

DG

Are you sure it was the BT line and not the electricity line?

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required